Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Little Princess Foundation

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 010667129
NY · NTEE O22
FY ending 2023-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Ethelene Coleman, Executive Director / CEO ($6,200) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 18 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 0th percentile of comparable organizationsbelow the typical range for comparable organizations

Benchmarked executive: Ethelene Coleman — reported title “PRESIDENT”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

18 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 18 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$39,532 total compensation of comparable organizations → $135,535 $6,200
$47,35610th
$56,52225th
$65,916Median
$80,82875th
$107,54990th
$6,200This org · 0th
p10$47,356
p25$56,522
p50$65,916
p75$80,828
p90$107,549
$6,200

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to NY cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Girls On The Run Of Stark County OH$238,236 Executive Dir. $54,722 $60,694 2025
Diamond In The Rough Youth Development Program Inc GA$233,615 President $43,204 $45,491 2025
Go Run Missoula MT$244,581 Executive Di $70,750 $81,976 2024
Carolina Youth Action Project SC$248,269 Co-director $56,694 $65,454 2023
Dress For Success Luzerne County PA$251,895 Founder, Executive Directo $52,000 $55,740 2024
Girls On The Run Of New Orleans LA$213,439 Executive Dir. $63,502 $77,382 2023
Girls Incorporated Of The Washington Dc Metro Area DC$264,258 Executive Director $143,688 $135,535 2024
Park Central Inc CT$267,489 Executive Director $65,520 $67,984 2023
Girls On The Run Of Long Island NY$204,651 Executive Dir. $63,880 $62,047 2024
Southside Girls Club Inc TX$277,636 Executive Dir. $36,766 $39,532 2024
The Gems Camp TX$278,071 Vice President Of Partnership $44,786 $48,155 2024
Girls On The Run Upstate Sc SC$281,344 Executive Director $44,089 $49,441 2024
Wellfit Girls Program Southwest FL$287,269 Executive Director (Thru Jan '24) $99,100 $100,070 2024
Girls On The Run Idaho Inc ID$297,943 Executive Dir. $80,250 $91,764 2024
Elevateher CO$303,841 Executive Dir. $64,400 $66,377 2024
Girls On The Run Of Central Illinois IL$314,079 Executive Dir. $67,642 $71,481 2024
Baya Corporation IN$334,879 Executive Director $50,442 $58,867 2023
Gurls Talk Inc NY$335,567 Executive Director $125,000 $125,000 2023

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to NY cost of living and 2023 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to NY cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default0th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)0th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted0th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted0th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Ethelene Coleman) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 18 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (O22), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $6,200 is reasonable (approximately the 0th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.