Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

White River Partnership Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 030371746
VT · NTEE C32
FY ending 2023-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Mary Russ, Executive Director / CEO ($65,126) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 71 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 51st percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

How comparable organizations were selected

71 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 71 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$1,976 total compensation of comparable organizations → $147,502 $65,126
$10,47310th
$42,37825th
$64,674Median
$81,35175th
$108,26490th
$65,126This org · 51st
p10$10,473
p25$42,378
p50$64,674
p75$81,351
p90$108,264
$65,126

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to VT cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateTotal revenueTotal compSource
Agricultural Drainage Management Coalition IncIA $299,322$125,265 990
Friends Of The White River IncIN $301,798$79,126 990
Professional Training AssociationWA $302,967$96,248 990
Rozalia ProjectVT $294,533$73,555 990
Heart Of The Lakes Ctr For Land ConsMI $305,789$102,457 990
Friends Of Sausal CreekCA $306,596$55,764 990
Lake Merritt InstituteCA $308,288$66,464 990
Lake Of The Ozarks Watershed AllianMO $290,092$95,028 990
Freshwaters Illustrated IncOR $310,842$65,740 990
Alpine Watershed GroupCA $316,148$47,437 990
Michigan Municipal Wetland Alliance IncMI $324,309$51,803 990
Project41CA $273,056$84,496 990
Peconic Baykeeper IncNY $327,883$108,045 990
Harney County Watershed Council IncOR $270,607$48,208 990
Northwoods Wildlife CenterWI $328,808$5,833 990
Friends Of The Eel RiverCA $331,549$67,091 990
Western Water ConservationCA $332,382$7,657 990
Upper Delaware Council IncNY $332,834$57,079 990
Bitterroot Water PartnershipMT $332,971$87,283 990
South Santiam Watershed CouncilOR $332,988$72,814 990
Malama Na ApapaHI $265,256$10,473 990
Missouri Stream Team Watershed CoalitionMO $265,034$45,874 990
Jones River Watershed AssocincMA $264,493$52,031 990
North Santiam Watershed CouncilOR $334,896$69,015 990
San Marcos River FoundationTX $334,909$50,997 990

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to VT cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default51st
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)45th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted59th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted51st

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Mary Russ) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 71 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (C32), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $65,126 is reasonable (approximately the 51st percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.