Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Ocl Properties Xi Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 113799182
NY · NTEE L20
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Karen Schwartz, Executive Director / CEO ($73,290) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 17 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 76th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Karen Schwartz — reported title “CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER”, selected as the organization's highest-paid individual — no exact title match, so confirm this is a comparable role.

How comparable organizations were selected

17 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 17 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$7,722 total compensation of comparable organizations → $180,441 $73,290
$24,24910th
$30,65925th
$60,104Median
$72,64875th
$115,87890th
$73,290This org · 76th
p10$24,249
p25$30,659
p50$60,104
p75$72,648
p90$115,878
$73,290

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to NY cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Ocl Properties Ix Inc NY$147,783 Chief Financial Officer $73,290 $73,290 2024
East 54th Street Housing Development NY$149,704 Ceo $60,217 $61,996 2023
Phipps Affordable Housing Support Corp NY$122,719 President/ceo $180,441 $180,441 2024
Fernclif Housing Development Fund NY$162,877 President $58,380 $60,104 2023
385 Third Avenue Housing Development NY$166,146 Ceo $60,217 $61,996 2023
Bailey Holt House Housing Development NY$167,092 Member $29,779 $30,659 2023
Mental Retardation Community Services Of Nassau County-project NY$113,605 Chief Executive Officer $179,760 $179,760 2024
Share Xi Inc NY$113,510 Executive Director $70,564 $72,648 2023
Loretto Apartments At O'brien Road NY$171,702 Chairperson $27,907 $27,907 2024
Aim Community Living Inc NY$108,072 Executive Director $36,676 $36,676 2024
White's Livery Housing Development NY$106,819 Interim Ceo (February - July) $7,500 $7,722 2023
Niagara Village Housing Development Fund NY$177,900 Cfo $23,006 $23,686 2023
Habitat For Humanity Of Genesee NY$103,514 Executive Di $53,748 $52,363 2025
Ocl Properties Viii Inc NY$180,843 Chief Financial Officer $73,290 $73,290 2024
Vip Rjp Housing Development Fund NY$187,328 President/ceo $50,896 $52,399 2023
Share Viii Inc NY$95,316 Executive Director $70,564 $72,648 2023
Episcopal Community Housing Development NY$95,006 President & Ceo $24,624 $24,624 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to NY cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to NY cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default76th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)76th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted0th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted18th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Karen Schwartz) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 17 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (L20) + NY + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $73,290 is reasonable (approximately the 76th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.