Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Citizens Union Of The City Of New York

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 134997570
NY · NTEE W20
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Elisabeth Gotbaum, Executive Director / CEO ($27,500) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 15 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 20th percentile of comparable organizationsbelow the typical range for comparable organizations

How comparable organizations were selected

15 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 15 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$8,854 total compensation of comparable organizations → $216,086 $27,500
$19,37210th
$58,27325th
$94,162Median
$116,09975th
$169,76090th
$27,500This org · 20th
p10$19,372
p25$58,273
p50$94,162
p75$116,099
p90$169,760
$27,500

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to NY cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateTotal revenueTotal compSource
New England First AmendmentMA $163,291$104,418 990
Allegheny League Of MunicipalitiesPA $160,784$134,362 990
Judicial Action GroupAL $152,760$94,162 990
Challenge AmericaCO $138,619$25,037 990
Common Sense Policy InstituteVA $200,100$56,482 990
Hawaii Leeward Planning ConferenceHI $203,962$121,565 990
Western States StrategiesOR $208,010$15,596 990
State Review Of Oil And Natural GasCO $120,382$85,953 990
Democracy 21 Education FundDC $211,001$60,063 990
Iowa Municipal Finance Officers AssociationIA $216,899$8,854 990
Juvenile Justice Advocates InternationalMN $225,208$76,263 990
Louisiana Partnership For Children And FamiliesLA $225,511$104,443 990
Renew America Together IncAR $231,584$193,358 990
Science Literacy ProjectOH $232,504$216,086 990
The California Center For CivicCA $238,069$110,633 990

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to NY cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default20th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)20th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted20th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted80th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Elisabeth Gotbaum) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 15 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (W20), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $27,500 is reasonable (approximately the 20th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.