Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Cazenovia Preservation Foundation Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 166101151
NY · NTEE C340
FY ending 2023-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Jennifer Wong, Executive Director / CEO ($43,875) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 69 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 23rd percentile of comparable organizationsbelow the typical range for comparable organizations

How comparable organizations were selected

69 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 69 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$1,172 total compensation of comparable organizations → $156,614 $43,875
$21,11510th
$44,97425th
$79,669Median
$94,19675th
$100,10890th
$43,875This org · 23rd
p10$21,115
p25$44,974
p50$79,669
p75$94,196
p90$100,108
$43,875

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to NY cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateTotal revenueTotal compSource
Indigenous Conservation CouncilVA $302,230$44,974 990
Texas Land Trust CouncilTX $300,632$156,614 990
Kansas Land Trust IncKS $313,442$99,757 990
Roaring Fork Safe PassagesCO $294,998$87,329 990
Dover Land Conservation TrustMA $293,352$7,468 990
Waukesha County Land Conservancy IncWI $289,154$79,669 990
Utah Dine BikeyahUT $324,369$143,017 990
Sundance Nature AllianceUT $285,075$82,510 990
South Hero Land Trust IncVT $328,626$59,569 990
Northern California Regional Land TrustCA $328,743$87,852 990
Bolsa Chica Land TrustCA $331,328$64,640 990
Lincoln Land Conservation TrustMA $279,228$21,753 990
Kent Land Trust IncCT $335,603$49,132 990
Center For Whole Communities IncVT $336,563$94,037 990
Red River Gorge Climbers' Coalition IncKY $339,182$84,255 990
Block Island Conservancy IncRI $269,646$55,003 990
The Glacier-two Medicine AllianceMT $266,036$80,521 990
Kahaluu KuahewaHI $264,425$55,618 990
Land Trust Of The Treasure ValleyID $263,019$98,888 990
Wareham Land Trust IncMA $262,864$47,613 990
Southeast Michigan Land ConservancyMI $262,599$100,839 990
Land Conservation FoundationIL $262,318$38,584 990
River Fields IncKY $349,378$90,552 990
Bear-paw Regional GreenwaysNH $350,074$71,253 990
Virginias United Land TrustsVA $259,231$99,632 990

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to NY cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default23rd
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)29th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted25th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted19th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Jennifer Wong) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 69 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (C34), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $43,875 is reasonable (approximately the 23rd percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.