Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Lyn Stacie Getz Foundation Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 203486477
MD · NTEE T113
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Michael I Friedman, Executive Director / CEO ($12,125) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 19 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 53rd percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Michael I Friedman — reported title “PRESIDENT & PUBLIC DIRECTOR”, selected as the organization's highest-paid individual — no exact title match, so confirm this is a comparable role.

How comparable organizations were selected

19 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 19 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$3,980 total compensation of comparable organizations → $70,284 $12,125
$8,72710th
$9,50925th
$10,609Median
$31,36375th
$39,09090th
$12,125This org · 53rd
p10$8,727
p25$9,509
p50$10,609
p75$31,363
p90$39,090
$12,125

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to MD cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Nathalie & Theodore Jones Charitable MA$59,543 Trustee $9,991 $9,887 2023
Nathalie & Theodore Jones Charitable MA$58,341 Trustee $11,015 $10,587 2024
Nathalie & Theodore Jones Charitable MA$58,126 Trustee $11,037 $10,609 2024
Nathalie & Theodore Jones Charitable MA$55,065 Trustee $10,969 $10,543 2024
Nathalie & Theodore Jones Charitable MA$52,285 Trustee $10,643 $10,230 2024
John & Claudia Holliman Affiliated Fund OK$69,424 Secretary $25,864 $31,363 2023
Nathalie & Theodore Jones Charitable MA$49,309 Trustee $9,499 $9,130 2024
Nathalie & Theodore Jones Charitable MA$46,636 Trustee $9,296 $8,935 2024
Vogt Family Affiliated Fund Of The Okc OK$46,138 Secretary $25,864 $31,363 2023
Minnesota Foundation For Fiscal MN$74,212 Executive Director $3,766 $3,980 2024
Rancho Santa Fe Foundation CA$74,250 President & Ceo $21,459 $19,820 2024
Cynchealth Foundation Inc NE$74,951 Director & Ceo $14,250 $16,394 2024
Lezah Stenger Foundation MO$43,227 Director $35,676 $40,417 2024
Nathalie & Theodore Jones Charitable MA$42,944 Trustee $8,363 $8,276 2023
Nathalie & Theodore Jones Charitable MA$42,445 Trustee $9,197 $8,840 2024
Faholo Foundation Inc MD$78,240 Director $29,328 $29,328 2024
Wisconsin Builders Foundation Inc WI$79,695 Executive Director $33,352 $37,257 2024
The Tyner Family Foundation OH$83,525 Treasurer $60,259 $70,284 2023
Chouteau House Qalicb Inc MO$89,148 Vp Of Finance $34,211 $38,758 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to MD cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to MD cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default53rd
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)53rd
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted0th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted74th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Michael I Friedman) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 19 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (T11), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $12,125 is reasonable (approximately the 53rd percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.