Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Music For Autism

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 208858821
CA · NTEE A68
FY ending 2023-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Laura Lazar, Executive Director / CEO ($35,744) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 19 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 74th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Laura Lazar — reported title “EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

19 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 19 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$1,195 total compensation of comparable organizations → $103,757 $35,744
$6,81910th
$10,62725th
$19,233Median
$35,10475th
$50,71390th
$35,744This org · 74th
p10$6,819
p25$10,627
p50$19,233
p75$35,104
p90$50,713
$35,744

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to CA cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
International Jazz Day Az AZ$87,344 Executive Dir. $18,215 $19,704 2024
Spokane Chamber Music Association WA$90,126 Marketing Director $11,100 $11,179 2024
Agc Of Oklahoma Education Foundation OK$82,641 Executive Director $13,188 $16,817 2023
Arco Collaborative Inc NY$93,123 President $39,000 $39,641 2024
Festival Music Society Inc IN$78,111 Managing Director $22,800 $27,046 2024
Picco Music Academy Inc CA$96,948 President $15,500 $15,055 2024
Chamber Music Society Of MN$72,513 Executive Di $27,500 $30,566 2024
Russian Chamber Art Society VA$70,860 Treasurer, Director $3,500 $3,914 2023
Da Capo Virginia VA$103,840 Executive & Vivo Director/past-president $43,633 $47,389 2024
Maui Music Mission HI$64,941 Ceo $7,277 $7,545 2023
The Francis Poulenc Trio Inc MD$63,664 Secretary/vice President $17,500 $18,947 2023
Noontime Concerts CA$63,570 Executive Director $103,757 $103,757 2023
Chamber Music Society Of New Paltz Inc NY$63,535 President $9,500 $9,941 2023
Trilogy An Opera Company NJ$111,031 Artisticexecutive Director $19,150 $19,233 2024
Tanner Gift Of Music Trust UT$113,311 Secretary/tr $8,500 $10,075 2023
International Federation For Choral Music TX$113,444 Office Manager $36,960 $41,588 2024
Lake County Symphony CA$114,856 President $1,230 $1,195 2024
The Classical Saxophone Project Inc NY$128,004 President $27,500 $27,952 2024
Musiconnects Inc MA$128,066 Executive Di $65,000 $64,009 2025

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to CA cost of living and 2023 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to CA cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default74th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)74th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted74th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted68th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Laura Lazar) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 19 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (A68), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $35,744 is reasonable (approximately the 74th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.