Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Center For Mathematics And Teaching Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 208967166
CA · NTEE B90
FY ending 2023-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Theresa Lee, Executive Director / CEO ($86,718) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 47 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 70th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

How comparable organizations were selected

47 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 47 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$12 total compensation of comparable organizations → $184,614 $86,718
$23,49810th
$42,31725th
$64,500Median
$90,40175th
$109,88490th
$86,718This org · 70th
p10$23,498
p25$42,317
p50$64,500
p75$90,401
p90$109,884
$86,718

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to CA cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateTotal revenueTotal compSource
Lead CaliforniaCA $339,024$184,614 990
Yours HumanlyCA $330,099$69,934 990
Community Alliance For LearningCA $345,986$54,037 990
Marshmallow MindsCA $324,319$64,500 990
Glaucoma Research And Education GroupCA $348,575$38,852 990
Blockchain Acceleration FoundationCA $318,194$51,637 990
Yes We Can World FoundationCA $357,183$43,709 990
Apples To Zucchini Cooking SchoolCA $358,656$24,322 990
Afghan-american Community OrganizationCA $306,716$91,393 990
The Nctu FoundationCA $305,834$1,457 990
Mindcatcher EducationCA $365,704$134,060 990
The Kaleidoscope InstituteCA $301,635$100,733 990
Cead - Center For Education And Academic DevelopmentCA $300,739$62,650 990
California Victor UniversityCA $372,829$23,311 990
Altura Credit Union FoundationCA $296,086$40,924 990
Joseph And Edna Josephson Inst Of EthicsCA $374,983$125,519 990
Everlasting Education IncCA $376,802$73,113 990
One Spark Foundation IncCA $385,208$44,806 990
Multinational Exchange For Sustainable ACA $386,952$82,113 990
National Veterans TransitionCA $282,384$36,424 990
Bay Area Teacher Training InstituteCA $390,714$7,672 990
Mentor Tutor ConnectionCA $392,348$38,433 990
Foundation For Santa Barbara High SchoolCA $276,838$49,141 990
Homeownership OcCA $398,009$91,361 990
Words In The WildCA $270,630$23,622 990

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to CA cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default70th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)70th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted74th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted64th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Theresa Lee) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 47 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (B90) + CA + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $86,718 is reasonable (approximately the 70th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.