Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Home For The Armenian Aged Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 221659501
NJ · NTEE P750
FY ending 2024-03-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Stephen Epstein, Executive Director / CEO ($33,922) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 19 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 42nd percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Stephen Epstein — reported title “ADMINISTRATOR”, selected as the organization's highest-paid individual — no exact title match, so confirm this is a comparable role.

How comparable organizations were selected

19 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 19 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$1,675 total compensation of comparable organizations → $428,628 $33,922
$12,96810th
$17,36425th
$41,351Median
$56,37375th
$69,68790th
$33,922This org · 42nd
p10$12,968
p25$17,364
p50$41,351
p75$56,373
p90$69,687
$33,922

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to NJ cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Villagesokc Inc OK$221,397 Executive Di $15,600 $19,808 2023
Abilities At Crestview Inc FL$219,629 President/ceo $38,173 $41,351 2023
Caring Carroll Inc MD$213,516 Executive Di $64,827 $67,881 2024
Harrison House Personal Care Home PA$232,550 Executive Vp $41,926 $46,828 2024
Mountlake Terrace Community Senior Center WA$237,138 Executive Director $76,698 $76,910 2024
Unalaska Senior Citizens AK$205,613 Program Manager $40,365 $44,499 2023
Friendship Village Foundation IA$196,568 President/ce $358,763 $428,628 2025
Senior Companion Program Inc WI$192,267 Executive Dir. $47,500 $55,561 2024
Greenfield Manor Inc WI$260,032 Executive Dir. $9,600 $11,229 2024
Your Second Family OH$177,452 Caregiver $27,900 $34,075 2023
Unity Aging Services Inc NY$174,480 Ceo $54,881 $57,185 2023
The Slovak Garden FL$169,495 President $12,815 $13,484 2024
Marian Manor Apartments Inc ND$279,559 Administrator $24,902 $31,512 2023
Bloomfield Hills CA$158,545 Board Member/ceo/cfo $25,600 $25,490 2023
All Together Network Inc MD$157,615 President $1,600 $1,675 2024
The Kremer Home Inc OH$152,097 Executive Director(2nd) $12,216 $14,920 2023
Real Services Housing Inc IN$300,889 President/ce $36,785 $44,732 2023
Bishop Morrow Personal Care Home PA$302,813 President $12,000 $13,403 2024
West Valley Towers CA$325,033 President/ceo $68,128 $65,889 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to NJ cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to NJ cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default42nd
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)47th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted68th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted37th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Stephen Epstein) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 19 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (P75), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $33,922 is reasonable (approximately the 42nd percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.