Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Enrichment Center For The Blind And Visually Impaired

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 222241306
NJ · NTEE G41Z
FY ending 2024-07-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Margaret H Graw, Executive Director / CEO ($25,704) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 16 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 6th percentile of comparable organizationsbelow the typical range for comparable organizations

How comparable organizations were selected

16 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 16 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$2,804 total compensation of comparable organizations → $151,250 $25,704
$27,92610th
$38,37825th
$73,894Median
$110,58875th
$130,72090th
$25,704This org · 6th
p10$27,926
p25$38,378
p50$73,894
p75$110,588
p90$130,720
$25,704

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to NJ cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateTotal revenueTotal compSource
Mission Vision IncPA $219,644$27,923 990
American Society Of Ophthalmic PlasticFL $227,357$37,914 990
Community Services For SightPA $218,609$57,415 990
Vision Resource CenterNC $229,796$72,865 990
Hull Foundation And LearningOR $231,509$54,606 990
Cedar Springs Vision IncTX $236,404$75,410 990
Houston Lighthouse Foundation IncTX $208,760$27,929 990
Blindsight Delaware IncDE $205,368$95,053 990
LifesightSD $259,141$121,362 990
Federation Center Of The BlindSC $183,953$38,532 990
Maine Society Of EyeME $171,786$2,804 990
Community Center For The BlindCA $276,926$74,923 990
Visual Compassion IncTX $283,424$151,250 990
Vision Outreach International IncMI $303,002$106,996 990
Charity Of The Eye Care NetworkCA $311,331$132,049 990
The Support Sight FoundationPA $329,158$129,391 990

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to NJ cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default6th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)19th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted13th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted6th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Margaret H Graw) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 16 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (G41), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $25,704 is reasonable (approximately the 6th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.