Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Cancer Schmancer Foundation

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 260489038
CA · NTEE G193
FY ending 2023-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Susan Holland, Executive Director / CEO ($117,721) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 19 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 74th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Susan Holland — reported title “Executive Dir.”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

19 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 19 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$28,546 total compensation of comparable organizations → $215,736 $117,721
$31,24710th
$53,61825th
$91,865Median
$112,32075th
$147,48290th
$117,721This org · 74th
p10$31,247
p25$53,618
p50$91,865
p75$112,320
p90$147,482
$117,721

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to CA cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Hcf Supporting Organization TX$485,155 Executive Di $24,719 $28,635 2023
Recovery On Water Inc IL$489,596 Executive Director $87,500 $96,763 2024
Cancer Support Community - California CA$459,287 Executive Director $100,452 $97,570 2024
Slk Health Services Corporation MD$514,105 Executive Director $40,790 $44,163 2023
Chris Elliott Fund WA$529,069 President & Ceo $102,500 $103,226 2024
Huntington's Disease Youth Organization MI$415,962 Executive Director $110,000 $127,714 2024
Malecare Inc NY$571,570 Executive Director $206,156 $215,736 2023
Helene Foundation NC$387,297 Officer $79,040 $91,865 2024
National Fabry Disease Foundation NC$592,005 Chair $126,174 $142,868 2025
Healing Strong Inc GA$596,652 President/ex $50,000 $58,221 2023
Empower Mississippi MS$610,844 President $22,786 $28,546 2024
Sarah's House Of Maine ME$351,019 Executive Di $64,500 $74,796 2023
Well Being Development MN$345,334 Executive Director $28,700 $31,900 2024
The Diabetes Family Connection NC$622,543 Executive Dir. $40,962 $49,015 2023
Go Jen Go Foundation Inc NC$674,396 Executive Dir. $82,500 $98,719 2023
Buddy Up For Life Inc OH$686,140 President/executive Direct $61,458 $71,333 2025
The Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Action CA$693,686 Executive Director $93,525 $90,842 2024
Music Movement Inc CA$713,852 President $125,000 $121,414 2024
Project Santa Fe Foundation Inc UT$721,293 President, Executive Direc $140,000 $165,937 2023

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to CA cost of living and 2023 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to CA cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default74th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)79th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted74th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted63rd

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Susan Holland) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 19 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (G19), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $117,721 is reasonable (approximately the 74th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.