Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Dress For Success Luzerne County

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 272155587
PA · NTEE O22
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Linda Armstrong, Executive Director / CEO ($52,000) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 21 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 33rd percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Linda Armstrong — reported title “FOUNDER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTO”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

21 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 21 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$5,784 total compensation of comparable organizations → $126,440 $52,000
$36,87910th
$46,12325th
$61,062Median
$72,19075th
$93,35590th
$52,000This org · 33rd
p10$36,879
p25$46,123
p50$61,062
p75$72,190
p90$93,355
$52,000

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to PA cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Carolina Youth Action Project SC$248,269 Co-director $56,694 $61,062 2023
Go Run Missoula MT$244,581 Executive Di $70,750 $76,476 2024
Girls Incorporated Of The Washington Dc Metro Area DC$264,258 Executive Director $143,688 $126,440 2024
Little Princess Foundation NY$238,733 President $6,200 $5,784 2023
Girls On The Run Of Stark County OH$238,236 Executive Dir. $54,722 $56,621 2025
Park Central Inc CT$267,489 Executive Director $65,520 $63,422 2023
Diamond In The Rough Youth Development Program Inc GA$233,615 President $43,204 $42,438 2025
Southside Girls Club Inc TX$277,636 Executive Dir. $36,766 $36,879 2024
The Gems Camp TX$278,071 Vice President Of Partnership $44,786 $44,924 2024
Girls On The Run Upstate Sc SC$281,344 Executive Director $44,089 $46,123 2024
Wellfit Girls Program Southwest FL$287,269 Executive Director (Thru Jan '24) $99,100 $93,355 2024
Girls On The Run Of New Orleans LA$213,439 Executive Dir. $63,502 $72,190 2023
Girls On The Run Idaho Inc ID$297,943 Executive Dir. $80,250 $85,606 2024
Girls On The Run Of Long Island NY$204,651 Executive Dir. $63,880 $57,884 2024
Elevateher CO$303,841 Executive Dir. $64,400 $61,923 2024
Girls On The Run Of Central Illinois IL$314,079 Executive Dir. $67,642 $66,684 2024
Baya Corporation IN$334,879 Executive Director $50,442 $54,917 2023
Gurls Talk Inc NY$335,567 Executive Director $125,000 $116,612 2023
Girls Incorporated Of Hamblen County TN$364,110 Executive Director $47,720 $50,299 2024
Bay Area Girls Rock Camp CA$370,530 Co-executive $32,040 $27,743 2024
Girls Incorporated Of Winter Haven FL$374,944 Executive Director $68,210 $66,154 2023

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to PA cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to PA cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default33rd
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)38th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted33rd
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted33rd

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Linda Armstrong) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 21 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (O22), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $52,000 is reasonable (approximately the 33rd percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.