Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Petroleum Industry Data Exchange

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 274497125
TX · NTEE S46
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Mimi Stansbury, Executive Director / CEO ($18,000) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 18 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 6th percentile of comparable organizationsbelow the typical range for comparable organizations

Benchmarked executive: Mimi Stansbury — reported title “President & Director Post 12/20/24”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

18 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 18 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$12,679 total compensation of comparable organizations → $258,612 $18,000
$28,40410th
$67,60825th
$95,918Median
$176,98175th
$208,10490th
$18,000This org · 6th
p10$28,404
p25$67,608
p50$95,918
p75$176,981
p90$208,104
$18,000

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to TX cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Queen Creek Chamber Of Commerce AZ$282,411 President $85,000 $84,135 2023
Project First Rate IL$295,209 Executive Director $112,170 $107,401 2025
Society For Pediatric Interventional CO$295,763 Executive Director $24,286 $23,280 2024
Ohio Association Of Physician Assistants OH$305,495 Executive Director $104,300 $110,435 2024
Ciecdciw Safety Institute CA$254,555 Director $193,992 $172,407 2023
Texas E-health Alliance TX$244,542 Ceo $200,000 $205,907 2023
New York Gaming Association Inc NY$345,000 Executive Dir. $168,465 $156,677 2023
Lapine Chamber Of Commerce Inc OR$226,939 Executive Director $33,833 $30,600 2025
Georgia Automotive Manufacturers GA$223,224 President & Ceo $84,000 $84,434 2024
Great Lakes Sports Commission MI$221,743 Executive Director $206,650 $213,231 2024
Supplier Compliance Audit Network AR$221,225 Executive Di $58,500 $65,736 2024
Hawaii Asphalt Paving Industry HI$365,905 Executive Di $204,718 $178,505 2025
Advanced Energy Economy Texas TX$203,051 Board Member $69,250 $69,250 2024
Home Builder's Association Of St Joseph IN$382,462 Executive Director $69,900 $75,868 2023
Industry Council For Emergency Response DC$402,605 Executive Director $223,321 $201,696 2023
Energy Trading Institute DC$423,863 Secretary $294,796 $258,612 2024
Medical Staff Of Good Samaritan Hospital CA$427,380 Past Chief Of Staff $14,688 $12,679 2024
Montana Petroleum Association MT$427,492 Prev Exec. Dir. $62,231 $67,060 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to TX cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to TX cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default6th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)6th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted6th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted6th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Mimi Stansbury) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 18 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (S46), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $18,000 is reasonable (approximately the 6th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.