Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Royal Stage Christian Performing Arts

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 274744494
CA · NTEE A60
FY ending 2023-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Tamara Warta, Executive Director / CEO ($11,000) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 19 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 16th percentile of comparable organizationsbelow the typical range for comparable organizations

Benchmarked executive: Tamara Warta — reported title “Executive Director”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

19 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 19 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$1,800 total compensation of comparable organizations → $92,020 $11,000
$5,53410th
$24,10825th
$42,815Median
$58,79875th
$68,76190th
$11,000This org · 16th
p10$5,534
p25$24,108
p50$42,815
p75$58,798
p90$68,761
$11,000

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to CA cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Santa Clara Valley Performing Arts Association CA$282,072 Artistic Director $20,000 $19,426 2024
Carpinteria Community Theater Inc CA$281,492 Executive Director $50,000 $48,566 2024
Rawdance CA$296,383 Director $3,802 $3,693 2024
The Beat Berkeley Performing Arts Inc CA$256,115 Executive Dir. $28,789 $28,789 2023
Teada Productions CA$323,308 President & $60,000 $56,776 2025
Center Stage Dance Studio CA$248,693 President $6,171 $5,994 2024
Sino Us Performing Arts Organization CA$327,781 Secretary $62,699 $62,699 2023
North Bay Theatrics Inc CA$328,366 President $64,408 $64,408 2023
Dramaworks A Ca Nonprofit Benefit Corp CA$239,759 Vice President $18,000 $18,000 2023
Ovation Theatre CA$209,509 Executive Director $53,750 $52,208 2024
Prescott Circus Theatre CA$374,696 Executive Dir. $60,738 $58,995 2024
Bay Area Omni Foundation For CA$192,946 President $35,200 $35,200 2023
Del Sol Performing Arts CA$386,620 Assistant Se $42,815 $42,815 2023
Celebration Arts CA$392,684 Executive Director $32,083 $31,163 2024
Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra CA$396,157 Music Direcotr $35,730 $33,810 2025
Child Hope International CA$410,405 Executive Director $94,738 $92,020 2024
Luminary Arts Corporation CA$410,560 President $60,331 $58,600 2024
Conundrum Theatre Company Inc CA$424,860 Executive Direc $88,720 $86,175 2024
Katia And Company Inc CA$427,041 President $1,800 $1,800 2023

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to CA cost of living and 2023 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to CA cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default16th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)16th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted16th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted16th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Tamara Warta) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 19 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (A60) + CA + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $11,000 is reasonable (approximately the 16th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.