Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

United Chinese Learning Center

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 330207844
CA · NTEE A230
FY ending 2024-09-30
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Mei-jiuan Taur, Executive Director / CEO ($51,480) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 20 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 70th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Mei-jiuan Taur — reported title “PRINCIPAL”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

20 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 20 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$4,633 total compensation of comparable organizations → $115,189 $51,480
$11,62910th
$19,69125th
$35,041Median
$61,64075th
$79,39690th
$51,480This org · 70th
p10$11,629
p25$19,691
p50$35,041
p75$61,640
p90$79,396
$51,480

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to CA cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Contra Costa Chinese School CA$221,311 President $25,000 $25,000 2024
Independent Jewish World Cinema Inc CA$214,196 Secretary $47,500 $47,500 2024
Alliance Francaise De La Riviera Californienne Inc CA$213,405 Executive Director $30,901 $30,104 2025
Italingua Institute CA$246,445 President $78,452 $80,769 2023
Sri Poojalaya Cultural And Community Cen CA$256,325 Ceo $48,000 $48,000 2024
Torrance Chinese School CA$186,971 President $15,404 $15,007 2025
Race Matters Slo County CA$256,465 Executive Director $30,067 $30,955 2023
Razorcake Gorsky Press Inc CA$184,734 Exec Directo $12,028 $12,383 2023
Irish Outreach San Diego Inc CA$182,111 Executive Director $60,000 $60,000 2024
American Foundation For Tibetan Cultural CA$261,527 Ceo $12,500 $12,500 2024
Shep-ty CA$272,124 Executive Dir. $115,189 $115,189 2024
King Sejong Institute Center Usa CA$285,247 Cfo $38,004 $39,127 2023
Tubatulabals Of Kern Valley CA$155,709 Chairman $4,840 $4,840 2024
Vanguard Culture CA$288,923 Board President $20,642 $21,252 2023
Cambodia Town Inc CA$290,976 Secretary $4,500 $4,633 2023
Organizacion De Tlaxcaltecas Usa Inc CA$150,947 President $40,000 $40,000 2024
Advocates For Indigenous California CA$292,769 Executive Dir. $65,000 $66,920 2023
Balkan Cultural Center CA$301,138 President $22,000 $22,650 2023
Esselen Tribe Of Monterey County CA$316,920 Secretary $76,970 $79,243 2023
Iu Mien Community Services CA$328,273 Executive Director $66,560 $66,560 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to CA cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to CA cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default70th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)70th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted70th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted70th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Mei-jiuan Taur) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 20 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (A23) + CA + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $51,480 is reasonable (approximately the 70th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.