Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

The Villages Community Development Corp

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 364598309
MI · NTEE S30
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Michael Farr, Executive Director / CEO ($73,034) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 195 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 42nd percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

How comparable organizations were selected

195 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 195 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$202 total compensation of comparable organizations → $236,404 $73,034
$26,56310th
$46,45525th
$81,403Median
$109,70475th
$142,02090th
$73,034This org · 42nd
p10$26,563
p25$46,455
p50$81,403
p75$109,704
p90$142,020
$73,034

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to MI cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateTotal revenueTotal compSource
Economic Development CouncilTX $401,483$236,404 990
Kodiak Archipelago Leadership InstituteAK $400,877$92,680 990
Historic Hillsboro Downtown PartnershipOR $402,408$38,759 990
Princeton Business PartnershipNJ $402,438$100,897 990
Wenatchee Downtown AssociationWA $402,652$72,803 990
Vernon Economic DevelopmentWI $402,740$89,121 990
Waukesha County Center For Growth IncWI $400,269$176,823 990
Forest City Food CollectiveOH $400,126$70,178 990
Trend Community Development CorporationIL $399,854$105,872 990
Hyattsville Community DevelopmentMD $406,067$86,048 990
Fort Belknap Community Economic DevelopMT $396,766$313 990
Innovation For Green AdvancedCA $407,982$122,254 990
Summit Economic PartnershipCO $393,014$125,414 990
White Mountain Economic DevelopmentAZ $410,971$79,199 990
Langlade County EconomicWI $391,544$82,381 990
Explore SistersOR $412,708$98,355 990
Wabash Economic Growth AllianceincIN $413,922$137,928 990
Carroll Technology Council IncMD $389,169$96,449 990
Bloomfield Center Alliance IncNJ $414,130$86,384 990
Heart Of The Tree City IncIN $414,397$46,525 990
West Michigan Hispanic Chamber OfMI $387,399$26,948 990
Long Beach Accelerator IncCA $415,792$146,804 990
Aitkin County Growth IncMN $416,035$81,403 990
Greater Lincoln Chamber FoundationNE $386,587$56,393 990
Minnesota Center For Employee OwnershipMN $386,210$66,099 990

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to MI cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default42nd
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)40th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted43rd
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted33rd

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Michael Farr) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 195 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (S30), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $73,034 is reasonable (approximately the 42nd percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.