Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Downtown Janesville Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 383672455
WI · NTEE S30
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Elaina Szyjewski, Executive Director / CEO ($74,519) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 116 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 68th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

How comparable organizations were selected

116 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 116 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$2,176 total compensation of comparable organizations → $202,069 $74,519
$12,76110th
$34,89025th
$62,576Median
$82,43575th
$102,09090th
$74,519This org · 68th
p10$12,761
p25$34,890
p50$62,576
p75$82,435
p90$102,090
$74,519

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to WI cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateTotal revenueTotal compSource
Norfolk Innovation CorridorVA $221,725$18,491 990
We LeadIA $220,331$81,908 990
Lincoln County Economic Dev FoundationKS $223,067$65,139 990
Elevate Edgerton IncKS $220,011$142,562 990
Economic Development Partnership Of WrigMN $223,376$65,340 990
Inner City Green Team Economic And Enviromental DevelopmentNY $217,956$86,524 990
Betamore IncMD $217,026$71,426 990
Bay Area Women Coalition IncAL $217,019$55,860 990
Business & Education Network IncKY $227,365$13,872 990
Johnson County Economic Development CorpMO $229,565$90,167 990
Columbus Compact CorporationOH $213,718$82,046 990
Boonslick Community DevelopmentMO $213,628$91,576 990
Elwood Community Development CorporationIN $210,909$7,166 990
Sector67 IncWI $233,249$37,063 990
Gateway South Innovation DistrictMO $209,054$66,559 990
St Mary's County CommunityMD $234,480$44,760 990
Northwest Wisconsin EconomicWI $208,540$44,333 990
Old Town Commercial AssociationMI $208,424$65,534 990
Common Wealth IncOH $208,039$35,189 990
Creative Portland CorporationME $236,053$30,531 990
Santa Cruz WorksCA $236,447$69,453 990
Stanly County Convention And Vistiors Bureau IncNC $206,625$49,135 990
Economic Development Professionals AssociationSD $236,950$2,176 990
Parnassah Network IncNJ $236,955$15,843 990
World Trade Center AssociationCA $237,400$33,232 990

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to WI cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default68th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)61st
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted71st
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted54th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Elaina Szyjewski) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 116 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (S30), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $74,519 is reasonable (approximately the 68th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.