Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Northwoods Wildlife Center

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 391323508
WI · NTEE C320
FY ending 2021-06-30
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Harv Skjerven, Executive Director / CEO ($5,000) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 78 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 1st percentile of comparable organizationsbelow the typical range for comparable organizations

How comparable organizations were selected

78 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 78 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$1,693 total compensation of comparable organizations → $126,434 $5,000
$17,50710th
$44,19525th
$59,447Median
$72,67375th
$92,67090th
$5,000This org · 1st
p10$17,507
p25$44,195
p50$59,447
p75$72,673
p90$92,670
$5,000

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to WI cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateTotal revenueTotal compSource
Peconic Baykeeper IncNY $327,883$92,614 990
Friends Of The Eel RiverCA $331,549$57,509 990
Western Water ConservationCA $332,382$6,563 990
Upper Delaware Council IncNY $332,834$48,927 990
Bitterroot Water PartnershipMT $332,971$74,816 990
South Santiam Watershed CouncilOR $332,988$62,413 990
Michigan Municipal Wetland Alliance IncMI $324,309$44,404 990
North Santiam Watershed CouncilOR $334,896$59,158 990
San Marcos River FoundationTX $334,909$43,714 990
Maine Lakes SocietyME $336,391$63,039 990
Wyoming Wetland SocietyWY $338,401$45,661 990
Alpine Watershed GroupCA $316,148$40,661 990
Freshwaters Illustrated IncOR $310,842$56,351 990
Lake Merritt InstituteCA $308,288$56,972 990
Friends Of Sausal CreekCA $306,596$47,799 990
Heart Of The Lakes Ctr For Land ConsMI $305,789$87,823 990
Professional Training AssociationWA $302,967$82,502 990
Friends Of The White River IncIN $301,798$67,825 990
White River Partnership IncVT $299,632$55,824 990
Agricultural Drainage Management Coalition IncIA $299,322$107,373 990
Watershed Alliance OfWA $360,058$65,623 990
The Pomperaug River WatershedCT $360,277$52,451 990
Coachella Valley Irrigated Lands Coalition IncCA $361,310$9,885 990
Rozalia ProjectVT $294,533$63,050 990
Little River Wetlands Project IncIN $364,403$63,785 990

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to WI cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default1st
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)1st
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted1st
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted1st

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Harv Skjerven) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 78 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (C32), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $5,000 is reasonable (approximately the 1st percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.