Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Casa Del Pueblo Ii

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 392075488
AZ · NTEE L22
FY ending 2024-06-30
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Alicia Nunez, Executive Director / CEO ($32,113) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 210 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 37th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

How comparable organizations were selected

210 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 210 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$296 total compensation of comparable organizations → $498,079 $32,113
$11,71710th
$22,33025th
$38,902Median
$61,17075th
$93,94190th
$32,113This org · 37th
p10$11,717
p25$22,330
p50$38,902
p75$61,170
p90$93,941
$32,113

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to AZ cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateTotal revenueTotal compSource
Columbian Retirement Home IncCA $263,370$7,395 990
Independent Living Horizons Nine IncGA $265,847$22,767 990
Janua Coeli IncFL $262,251$30,242 990
Laurelwood Senior Housing CorporationTN $260,994$21,154 990
Meadow Road Housing Corporation IncNH $260,531$34,043 990
Bozeman Senior Housing IncMN $268,145$68,071 990
Dunn Family Senior Citizens Home IncMI $268,279$72,637 990
Heritage Place Phase IiiID $259,454$23,496 990
Indian Rock Supportive Housing IncMA $268,885$34,032 990
Ucc Xvii IncOH $258,578$55,916 990
Appleway Court 202WA $270,668$107,057 990
Chippewa Lutheran Housing CorpPA $270,824$41,957 990
Shelby County Senior Citizens CorpTX $257,195$33,450 990
Snhs Raymond Elderly Housing IncNH $271,123$50,102 990
The Army Retirement Residence FoundationVA $271,300$114,620 990
Hudson Senior Housing IncMN $256,839$68,071 990
Garden Terrace Commons Senior HousingMN $255,476$20,011 990
Summerside Woods IncOH $273,334$8,763 990
Bella Vida Forefront LivingTX $273,417$33,579 990
Guadalupe Senior VillageCO $254,265$35,554 990
Passumpsic View IncVT $253,901$24,511 990
Loretto Properties CorporationNY $253,117$26,221 990
Providence Blanchet AssociationWA $252,450$442,503 990
Stevens Senior Housing Of Ludlow IncMA $276,929$12,746 990
Cheyenne Senior Housing IncMN $250,150$68,071 990

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to AZ cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default37th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)40th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted0th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted70th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Alicia Nunez) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 210 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (L22), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $32,113 is reasonable (approximately the 37th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.