Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

International Cultural Exchange Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 421576967
AR · NTEE B99
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Dave Riner, Executive Director / CEO ($89,977) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 20 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 100th percentile of comparable organizationsabove the 90th percentile — board review recommended

Benchmarked executive: Dave Riner — reported title “Chairman of the Board”, selected as the organization's highest-paid individual — no exact title match, so confirm this is a comparable role.

How comparable organizations were selected

20 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 20 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$51 total compensation of comparable organizations → $83,921 $89,977
$5,12310th
$13,16125th
$35,935Median
$46,12975th
$68,03190th
$89,977This org · 100th
p10$5,123
p25$13,161
p50$35,935
p75$46,129
p90$68,031
$89,977

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to AR cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
South Carolina Cattlemens Foundation Inc SC$7,859 Exec Director $33,500 $32,010 2023
Pitzer College Costa Rica CA$8,145 President $88,447 $67,946 2024
Pennsylvania Public Education Foundation PA$8,690 Executive Director $77,541 $68,793 2024
Taller Creativo Inc PR$9,066 Director $50 $51 2023
Spirit Fire Meditative VT$9,516 President $41,250 $36,937 2024
Graduate Center Foundation Housing NY$6,406 Secretary $50,703 $41,965 2023
The Corporation For Penn State PA$6,380 President $56,351 $49,993 2024
Whitworth Foundation WA$6,377 University President $43,858 $34,933 2024
String Theory Corporation PA$6,220 Ceo $44,482 $40,629 2023
The Buhite-dimino Corridor For Oral And NY$9,793 President $70,388 $55,127 2025
Blue Line Foundation TX$6,000 Officer $48,000 $42,716 2024
Xkkf AK$10,000 Executive Director $6,667 $5,671 2024
Colorado School Of Mines Building Corporation CO$10,070 President $98,377 $83,921 2024
Ib Fund Us Inc DC$5,800 Board Member $24,400 $19,612 2023
International Teachers Project Inc RI$10,300 President $17,500 $14,929 2024
Michigan Council Of Deliberation MI$10,450 Former Secre $200 $189 2023
Ever Scouts Education Foundation DE$5,539 Executive Di $50,000 $44,841 2023
Simonds Music And Technology Founda CA$5,532 Treasurer $10,375 $7,765 2025
Pacb Foundation PA$11,406 President/ceo $18,372 $16,781 2023
Readysetexcel Inc CA$12,000 President $10,500 $7,858 2025

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to AR cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to AR cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default100th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)95th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted0th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted55th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Dave Riner) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 20 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE major group (B), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $89,977 is reasonable (approximately the 100th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.