Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

The Opera Atelier Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 454122494
FL · NTEE A6A
FY ending 2023-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Jacqueline Solorzano, Executive Director / CEO ($21,580) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 19 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 26th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Jacqueline Solorzano — reported title “Executive Director”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

19 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 19 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$5,069 total compensation of comparable organizations → $235,043 $21,580
$7,55510th
$18,99625th
$46,588Median
$63,91975th
$74,32290th
$21,580This org · 26th
p10$7,555
p25$18,996
p50$46,588
p75$63,919
p90$74,322
$21,580

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to FL cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Opera Company Of Middlebury VT$317,657 Administrative Director Eff 11/2023 End 3/2024 $27,750 $28,879 2024
Painted Sky Opera Inc OK$281,869 Trustee $6,600 $7,736 2023
Nova Center For The Performing Arts MT$335,164 Executive Director $43,417 $47,142 2025
Opera In Williamsburg Inc VA$265,950 Music Director $8,500 $8,486 2024
Opera On The James VA$349,600 General Director $72,000 $74,002 2023
Lyric Opera Of The North MN$253,372 Artistic Dir $45,600 $46,588 2024
New York Chinese Opera Society Inc NY$233,964 Executive Managing Directo $7,100 $6,829 2023
Southland Sings CA$229,213 President $32,866 $28,587 2025
Opera Roanoke VA$380,673 General Dire $63,614 $65,383 2023
Florida Grand Opera Inc FL$225,354 General Director, Ceo (Thru 10/2023) $241,986 $235,043 2024
Pacific Musicworks WA$217,957 Artistic Director $5,476 $5,069 2024
Pocket Opera Inc CA$391,868 General Director $50,400 $46,327 2023
Opera Louisiane Inc LA$397,792 General Director & Ceo $54,856 $62,454 2024
Teatro Grattacielo Inc NY$406,756 General And Artisticc Director $60,000 $56,058 2024
Wichita Grand Opera Inc KS$407,537 General Director $65,743 $75,604 2023
Baltimore Concert Opera Inc MD$413,560 Artistic And General Director $60,547 $58,527 2024
Charleston Opera Theater Inc SC$424,145 Executive Artistic Directo $8,950 $9,405 2025
Cedar Rapids Opera Theatre IA$450,651 Ex Officio B $66,090 $72,892 2025
Washington National Opera DC$450,793 General Director $50,907 $46,188 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to FL cost of living and 2023 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to FL cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default26th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)26th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted32nd
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted26th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Jacqueline Solorzano) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 19 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (A6A), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $21,580 is reasonable (approximately the 26th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.