Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Asi Coronado Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 461231685
MN · NTEE L22
FY ending 2025-03-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Stephen Vander Schaaf, Executive Director / CEO ($68,006) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 18 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 83rd percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Stephen Vander Schaaf — reported title “PRESIDENT/TR”, selected as the organization's highest-paid individual — no exact title match, so confirm this is a comparable role.

How comparable organizations were selected

18 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 18 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$18,076 total compensation of comparable organizations → $167,302 $68,006
$19,99210th
$23,94325th
$27,124Median
$59,50875th
$70,46090th
$68,006This org · 83rd
p10$19,992
p25$23,943
p50$27,124
p75$59,508
p90$70,460
$68,006

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to MN cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Carty Heights MN$491,083 President/ceo $23,414 $24,033 2024
Benet Place South MN$464,119 President And Ceo $41,871 $42,979 2024
Helena Elderhousing Inc MN$526,243 President/tr $68,006 $68,006 2025
Midway Pointe MN$533,311 President/ceo $23,414 $24,033 2024
Kings Crossing Apartments MN$545,388 President/ceo $23,414 $24,033 2024
Rochester Senior Housing Inc MN$436,349 President/tr $65,715 $67,454 2024
Sholom St Paul Senior Housing Inc MN$422,892 Ceo $22,194 $22,781 2024
Arbor Lakes Senior Housing MN$563,269 Executive Vice President Of Commonbond Housing $18,918 $19,992 2023
Opportunity Neighborhood MN$415,039 Executive Director $74,223 $76,187 2024
Mount Olivet Day Services MN$577,346 Administrator $61,525 $65,018 2023
Shepherd Oak Apartments Inc MN$396,732 President/ceo/administrator $26,425 $27,124 2024
Phs Rockwood Avenue Inc MN$604,242 Executive Director & Coo $17,610 $18,076 2024
Multi-county Builders MN$613,097 Executive Director $26,702 $27,408 2024
Riverview Apartments Senior Housing MN$365,928 Executive Vp Of Commonbond $23,297 $23,913 2024
Centennial Square MN$363,314 Ceo $39,249 $41,477 2023
Shepherd Oaks West Apartments Inc MN$361,165 President/ceo/administrato $26,425 $27,124 2024
Rosewood Court Inc MN$355,963 Ceo Of Bhs $158,313 $167,302 2023
Community For Affordable Senior MN$335,417 Evp Of Commonbond Housing $18,918 $19,992 2023

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to MN cost of living and 2025 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to MN cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default83rd
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)83rd
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted0th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted89th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Stephen Vander Schaaf) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 18 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (L22) + MN + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $68,006 is reasonable (approximately the 83rd percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.