Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Communities Of Excellence 2026 Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 463384692
CA · NTEE P20
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Stephanie Norling, Executive Director / CEO ($38,250) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 19 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 42nd percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

How comparable organizations were selected

19 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 19 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$4 total compensation of comparable organizations → $144,135 $38,250
$13,20410th
$25,70325th
$50,000Median
$91,85975th
$105,55090th
$38,250This org · 42nd
p10$13,204
p25$25,703
p50$50,000
p75$91,859
p90$105,550
$38,250

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to CA cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateTotal revenueTotal compSource
Social Science ObservatoryCA $119,170$91,732 990
Ventura County Central Service Office IncCA $126,080$72,886 990
Spring Research Innovation Network GroupCA $127,975$24,573 990
Careyes FoundationCA $128,003$16,473 990
Vetcares IncCA $128,729$130 990
Women In Revenue IncCA $106,627$144,135 990
Here To Serve IncCA $136,789$77,705 990
Mother-wiseCA $102,303$45,686 990
The Caritas FoundationCA $137,500$18,203 990
Emotional Health InstituteCA $95,630$4 990
Mattole Valley Resource CenterCA $151,615$29,283 990
Latinos For Leadership ExcellenceCA $81,059$101,938 990
Flourish Ministries IncCA $160,448$91,986 990
Nextstep MinistriesCA $163,347$27,524 990
Northern California Dr Martin Luther King Jr Community FoundatioCA $164,851$96,662 990
Santa Monica Bay Area Human RelationsCA $166,141$80,844 990
Sustainable Silicon ValleyCA $166,295$26,833 990
Hygieia Behavioral Health Foundation IncCA $166,700$120,000 990
587 Ministries IncCA $175,473$50,000 990

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to CA cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default42nd
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)42nd
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted42nd
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted37th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Stephanie Norling) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 19 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (P20) + CA + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $38,250 is reasonable (approximately the 42nd percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.