Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

South Jersey Dream Center Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 463760076
NJ · NTEE U99
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Natalie Fortunato, Executive Director / CEO ($35,000) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 16 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 13th percentile of comparable organizationsbelow the typical range for comparable organizations

Benchmarked executive: Natalie Fortunato — reported title “SECRETARY”, selected as the organization's highest-paid individual — no exact title match, so confirm this is a comparable role.

How comparable organizations were selected

16 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 16 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$7,923 total compensation of comparable organizations → $376,962 $35,000
$23,89510th
$89,47225th
$118,418Median
$202,18575th
$240,06090th
$35,000This org · 13th
p10$23,895
p25$89,472
p50$118,418
p75$202,185
p90$240,060
$35,000

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to NJ cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
The Center For Advancing Innovation Inc MD$432,823 Ceo $360,000 $376,962 2024
The Many Brains Project Inc MA$423,904 Head Of Research & Develop $161,305 $158,164 2025
Climate Science Legal Defense Fund NY$465,503 Executive Director $103,400 $104,649 2024
Center For Technology Integrity Inc MA$479,024 Acting Executive Director $210,269 $211,629 2024
Open Research Lab CA$494,168 Research Director $208,834 $207,937 2023
Idea Wild Inc CO$529,698 Pres/founder $63,081 $67,747 2024
Society Of American Military Engineers F VA$334,012 Executive Director (Thru 8/15/23) $7,116 $7,923 2023
Research Theory Inc TX$330,000 President $8,333 $9,612 2023
Radio Technical Commission VA$566,079 President $120,575 $130,393 2024
South Dakota Biotechnology Council SD$318,563 Executive Director $30,000 $38,178 2023
Data-driven Economic Strategies Inc CO$575,211 Executive Dir. $250,000 $268,491 2024
North American Associates Of The NY$309,994 Executive Di $98,333 $99,521 2024
Psychological Clinical Science IN$303,240 Executive Director $130,000 $149,589 2025
Bighorn Basin Paleotological PA$636,125 Executive Di $95,300 $106,443 2024
California Biotechnology Foundation CA$655,214 Treasurer $207,072 $200,268 2024
Wireshark Foundation CA$660,969 President $100,000 $96,714 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to NJ cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to NJ cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default13th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)19th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted13th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted6th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Natalie Fortunato) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 16 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (U99), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $35,000 is reasonable (approximately the 13th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.