Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Robert And Eileen Sill Family Foundation

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 464104662
OH · NTEE T11
FY ending 2023-06-30
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Ann Garson, Executive Director / CEO ($37,656) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 17 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 47th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Ann Garson — reported title “ASSISTANT SECRETARY”, selected as the organization's highest-paid individual — no exact title match, so confirm this is a comparable role.

How comparable organizations were selected

17 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 17 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$949 total compensation of comparable organizations → $240,109 $37,656
$6,66510th
$11,80325th
$38,958Median
$58,78675th
$67,25590th
$37,656This org · 47th
p10$6,665
p25$11,803
p50$38,958
p75$58,786
p90$67,255
$37,656

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to OH cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Providence Animal Center Foundation PA$25,836 Executive Director $8,213 $7,733 2023
Iarca Institute For Excellence Inc IN$27,107 Executive Director $15,000 $14,507 2024
Kr Fund Inc MD$25,146 President & Public Dir. Until 07/24 $30,197 $25,890 2024
Leonard And Diane Sherman Family IL$23,334 Treasurer $80,133 $72,246 2024
Blue Water Land Fund Inc MI$30,371 President/ceo $64,477 $61,031 2024
Tupper Family Foundation NJ$21,944 Trustee $6,184 $5,064 2024
The Real Estate Trust Of Silicon Valley Community Foundation CA$21,903 President $74,236 $58,786 2024
Thelma Pearl Howard Foundation CA$31,188 Secretary $53,882 $43,929 2023
Heritage Fund Supporting Foundation Inc IN$31,427 President & Ceo $12,204 $11,803 2024
The Intercommunity Foundation Inc CT$32,046 Incorporator/director $74,347 $63,927 2024
Sholk-kaplan Family Foundation Inc MD$20,583 President & Public Director $44,135 $38,958 2023
Guardian Angel Support Corp MO$20,460 Gasa President & Ceo $11,599 $11,266 2024
Tyler County Hospital Foundation TX$32,741 President $18,081 $17,077 2023
Gha Autism Supports Foundation NC$19,905 Ceo $260,099 $240,109 2025
Wisdom Wonder Project CA$33,551 President/executive Direct $1,164 $949 2023
Ritter Charitable Trust NV$35,779 Director $44,453 $42,070 2023
Dentaquest Care Group Inc MA$39,146 President/director [7/20/2024 - 12/31/2024] $62,202 $51,260 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to OH cost of living and 2023 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to OH cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default47th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)47th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted0th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted18th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Ann Garson) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 17 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (T11), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $37,656 is reasonable (approximately the 47th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.