Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Comite Pro 1

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 464162691
CA · NTEE R01
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Felipe Aguirre, Executive Director / CEO ($1,890) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 20 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 0th percentile of comparable organizationsbelow the typical range for comparable organizations

Benchmarked executive: Felipe Aguirre — reported title “OWNER”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

20 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 20 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$2,500 total compensation of comparable organizations → $625,527 $1,890
$14,13110th
$26,76325th
$43,746Median
$74,23175th
$94,85490th
$1,890This org · 0th
p10$14,131
p25$26,763
p50$43,746
p75$74,231
p90$94,854
$1,890

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to CA cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Arizonans Concerned About Smoking Inc AZ$44,255 Executive Director $37,525 $41,793 2024
Human Coalition Action TX$42,792 Executive Director $13,918 $16,599 2023
Essential Workers For Democracy WA$42,786 Executive Director $90,050 $90,960 2025
Maine Civic Action ME$47,054 Executive Di $38,163 $45,562 2023
Library Freedom Inc PA$40,981 Executive Director $112,477 $129,897 2024
Gold Anti-trust Action Committee Inc CT$40,029 Chairman $50,000 $54,291 2024
Truth Wins Out Inc FL$48,207 President $40,615 $45,491 2023
Gare Global Alliance For The Rights CA$48,692 Executive Director $42,000 $42,000 2024
La Voice Action CA$49,567 Executive Director $71,717 $73,835 2023
Be Ready Inc NJ$51,681 Executive Director $35,889 $37,108 2024
Stronger Together Movement Inc OK$52,184 Executive Director $67,380 $88,460 2023
Commonwealth Long Term Care Foundation VA$53,038 President $25,925 $29,845 2023
Free Buryatia Foundation VA$34,549 President $13,000 $14,966 2023
Real Property Alliance IL$53,737 Ceo/secretary $549,419 $625,527 2024
Justice For Wyandotte KS$33,597 Chief Executive Officer $14,000 $17,516 2024
Farmworker Enterprise Foundati CA$33,306 Board $2,500 $2,500 2024
Black Lives Matter Grassroots Inc CA$55,514 President $40,000 $40,000 2024
Campaign Legal Center Action DC$62,705 President $45,477 $47,581 2023
Black Socialists Of America NY$63,862 Executive Director $70,000 $75,417 2023
Maxcen-maxmath Women Society Inc Oklahoma Branch OK$65,539 Ceo $5,190 $6,618 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to CA cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to CA cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default0th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)0th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted25th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted0th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Felipe Aguirre) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 20 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE major group (R), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $1,890 is reasonable (approximately the 0th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.