Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Cedar Springs Vision Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 472350428
TX · NTEE G41
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Timothy Elinski, Executive Director / CEO ($67,308) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 19 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 63rd percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Timothy Elinski — reported title “President/Director”, selected as the organization's highest-paid individual — no exact title match, so confirm this is a comparable role.

How comparable organizations were selected

19 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 19 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$2,503 total compensation of comparable organizations → $135,000 $67,308
$24,52710th
$31,92125th
$65,036Median
$90,17175th
$115,96490th
$67,308This org · 63rd
p10$24,527
p25$31,921
p50$65,036
p75$90,171
p90$115,964
$67,308

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to TX cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Hull Foundation And Learning OR$231,509 Executive Di $52,500 $48,739 2024
Vision Resource Center NC$229,796 Executive Director $62,962 $65,036 2024
American Society Of Ophthalmic Plastic FL$227,357 Exec Director $35,000 $33,841 2023
Enrichment Center For The Blind And Visually Impaired NJ$223,055 Director $25,704 $22,942 2024
Mission Vision Inc PA$219,644 Board Member $25,000 $24,923 2024
Community Services For Sight PA$218,609 President/ceo $49,930 $51,247 2023
Lifesight SD$259,141 Executive Director $98,182 $108,323 2024
Houston Lighthouse Foundation Inc TX$208,760 President $24,213 $24,928 2023
Blindsight Delaware Inc DE$205,368 Executive Di $84,187 $84,841 2023
Community Center For The Blind CA$276,926 Exec Director $75,246 $66,874 2023
Visual Compassion Inc TX$283,424 Ceo $135,000 $135,000 2024
Federation Center Of The Blind SC$183,953 Executive Director $32,031 $34,392 2023
Maine Society Of Eye ME$171,786 Mseps Exec. $2,500 $2,503 2024
Vision Outreach International Inc MI$303,002 Executive Director $89,898 $95,501 2023
Charity Of The Eye Care Network CA$311,331 Ceo/president $132,619 $117,862 2023
The Support Sight Foundation PA$329,158 Director $115,846 $115,490 2024
Chautauqua Blind Association Inc NY$340,650 Executive Director $73,548 $66,439 2024
Better Vision Better Hope TX$347,733 President $30,000 $30,000 2024
Servants For Sight SC$353,090 Executive Director $65,000 $67,790 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to TX cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to TX cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default63rd
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)58th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted68th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted58th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Timothy Elinski) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 19 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (G41), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $67,308 is reasonable (approximately the 63rd percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.