Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Center For Scientific Integrity Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 472485133
NY · NTEE U20
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Adam Marcus, Executive Director / CEO ($11,330) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 17 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 12th percentile of comparable organizationsbelow the typical range for comparable organizations

Benchmarked executive: Adam Marcus — reported title “SECRETARY”, selected as the organization's highest-paid individual — no exact title match, so confirm this is a comparable role.

How comparable organizations were selected

17 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 17 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$420 total compensation of comparable organizations → $210,576 $11,330
$11,23010th
$21,36225th
$63,280Median
$121,36175th
$135,34190th
$11,330This org · 12th
p10$11,230
p25$21,362
p50$63,280
p75$121,361
p90$135,341
$11,330

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to NY cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Connecticut Academy Of CT$412,679 Executive Di $130,745 $139,669 2023
Texas Organic Farmers TX$393,353 Director $368 $420 2023
City Kid Science Inc NY$390,135 President $70,600 $70,600 2024
Decatur Makers Inc GA$384,484 Executive Director $83,550 $90,571 2025
Cato Neonatal Innovations Inc FL$481,221 President $18,800 $19,545 2024
Virginia Academy Of Science VA$372,146 Executive Officer $15,343 $16,878 2023
Solving For Science CA$338,901 Highest Compensated Employee $121,841 $116,431 2024
International Society For CA$332,093 Cfo/secretary $127,000 $121,361 2024
Paleocultural Research Group CO$318,728 Research Director $54,975 $58,336 2024
South Jersey Innovation Center NJ$318,444 Executive Director $21,000 $21,362 2023
Landweb Inc VT$315,096 Secretary/exec Director $55,181 $63,280 2023
Sociedad De Investigacion PR$555,860 Executive Di $35,448 $35,448 2024
Space For Humanity CO$556,619 Executive Director $119,166 $126,452 2024
Quest Science Center CA$600,267 Chief Learning Officer $134,633 $132,455 2023
Spritely Networked Communities DE$607,941 Dir Of Opera $40,385 $46,900 2022
Standards Coordinating Body For Gene MD$623,711 Executive Dir. $197,692 $210,576 2023
International Conference On PA$635,764 Secretary/treasurer $2,500 $2,759 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to NY cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to NY cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default12th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)12th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted12th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted12th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Adam Marcus) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 17 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (U20), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $11,330 is reasonable (approximately the 12th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.