Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Muslimahs United

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 473593495
OR · NTEE R01
FY ending 2023-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of China Brotherson, Executive Director / CEO ($59,192) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 27 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 41st percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

How comparable organizations were selected

27 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 27 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$5,507 total compensation of comparable organizations → $150,841 $59,192
$21,68910th
$39,54825th
$63,867Median
$98,94375th
$121,88990th
$59,192This org · 41st
p10$21,689
p25$39,548
p50$63,867
p75$98,943
p90$121,889
$59,192

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to OR cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateTotal revenueTotal compSource
New Jersey Black Empowerment Coalition IncNJ $207,388$121,400 990
Justice For Migrant Families WnyNY $206,494$55,771 990
New Path 1010 IncGA $205,668$64,901 990
Floridians For Alternatives To The DeathFL $213,697$63,867 990
Mississippi Rising CoalitionMS $215,781$51,780 990
North Dakota Family AllianceND $217,303$106,169 990
New Tolerance CampaignAZ $217,821$67,898 990
Oregon Alliance To Prevent Gun Violence For SafetyOR $221,309$76,101 990
Black Arts Movement Business District DevelopmentCA $193,004$112,666 990
Genequality IncDE $232,828$79,079 990
New Jersey Coalition Against Human Trafficking IncNJ $183,556$21,061 990
Goal JusticeSC $233,753$68,744 990
Conservative Roundtable Of TexasTX $239,624$122,622 990
Fundamedios IncDC $243,754$5,507 990
People's Justice ProjectOH $249,116$91,717 990
Advancement Project Action FundDC $250,000$43,356 990
Rise FoundationVA $260,769$35,740 990
American Constitutional Rights UnionFL $263,886$22,107 990
Hammer & Hope IncNY $150,840$150,841 990
Global Zero ActionDC $150,369$27,455 990
The Opportunity To Learn Action FundMA $150,000$59,253 990
Future Georgia Inc Dba Georgia Values ActionGA $276,804$143,914 990
Ella Baker Center Action FundCA $283,872$11,042 990
Greater Spokane ActionWA $291,825$24,129 990
Greater Spokane ProgressWA $299,949$61,581 990

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to OR cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default41st
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)41st
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted44th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted30th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (China Brotherson) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 27 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (R01), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $59,192 is reasonable (approximately the 41st percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.