Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Hua Zang Buddhist Institute

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 475424608
CA · NTEE X50
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Shu-hui Chiang, Executive Director / CEO ($4,500) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 18 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 0th percentile of comparable organizationsbelow the typical range for comparable organizations

Benchmarked executive: Shu-hui Chiang — reported title “CFO”, selected as the organization's highest-paid individual — no exact title match, so confirm this is a comparable role.

How comparable organizations were selected

18 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 18 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$6,177 total compensation of comparable organizations → $142,700 $4,500
$8,14410th
$13,03725th
$20,069Median
$62,74475th
$104,65290th
$4,500This org · 0th
p10$8,144
p25$13,037
p50$20,069
p75$62,744
p90$104,652
$4,500

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to CA cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Everyday Zen Inc CA$409,215 President $142,700 $142,700 2024
Dharma Ocean Foundation CO$391,743 Executive Di $19,044 $21,147 2024
Dieu Nhan Buddhist Med Ass Inc CA$425,350 President $6,000 $6,177 2023
Meditation Center Of Texas TX$383,409 Secretary $15,600 $18,072 2024
The Center For Contemplative CO$363,705 Executive Di $100,008 $111,054 2024
Vien An Buddhist Association MD$452,794 President $6,560 $7,313 2023
Mp Prajna Buddhist Mission Inc CA$459,616 President $67,600 $69,597 2023
Cambridge House For Inner Peace Inc MA$333,993 Former Executive Director $97,926 $101,908 2024
Buta Buddhism Research Center CA$304,544 President & Ceo $8,500 $8,500 2024
Lone Star Buddhist Meditation Center Inc TX$303,863 Head Monk $22,000 $26,239 2023
Drepung Loseling Institute Of Texas TX$287,822 Director $31,200 $36,143 2024
The Sangha Bhiksu Budhist Association Inc GA$524,195 Secretary $14,400 $16,768 2024
Wong Tai-sen Center CA$284,118 President $12,000 $12,354 2023
Diamond Cutter Classics AZ$273,905 President $36,789 $42,184 2023
Kumbum Chamtse-ling Inc IN$552,629 President $12,000 $15,087 2023
Houston Zen Community TX$573,377 Head Priest $58,812 $70,142 2023
Tu Vien Giac Hai MN$587,866 President $9,600 $10,985 2024
Dhammachai Foundation IL$601,814 Treasurer $16,680 $18,991 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to CA cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to CA cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default0th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)0th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted6th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted0th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Shu-hui Chiang) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 18 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (X50), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $4,500 is reasonable (approximately the 0th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.