Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

The Greater Baltimore Board Of Realtors Charitable Foundation Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 522143132
MD · NTEE T31
FY ending 2025-06-30
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Al Ingraham, Executive Director / CEO ($10,933) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 18 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 11th percentile of comparable organizationsbelow the typical range for comparable organizations

Benchmarked executive: Al Ingraham — reported title “Trustee”, selected as the organization's highest-paid individual — no exact title match, so confirm this is a comparable role.

How comparable organizations were selected

18 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 18 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$4,020 total compensation of comparable organizations → $125,553 $10,933
$11,25510th
$16,48425th
$36,886Median
$52,66575th
$72,15490th
$10,933This org · 11th
p10$11,255
p25$16,484
p50$36,886
p75$52,665
p90$72,154
$10,933

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to MD cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Emily's Power For A Cure TN$115,319 President $29,320 $34,837 2023
Partnersfinancial Charitable Foundation TX$114,298 Executive Director $24,000 $26,358 2024
Walker Area Community Foundation MN$121,987 Board Chair $3,600 $4,020 2023
Caldwell County Community Services Foundation TX$100,475 President $77,275 $84,869 2024
Yafa American Community Center NY$136,852 Key Employee $8,010 $7,947 2024
Nccf Property Investments Inc KS$137,922 Executive Dir. $10,783 $12,790 2024
Peaks Island Fund Inc ME$138,733 Secretary $12,000 $13,193 2024
Rancho Cucamonga Community & Arts CA$139,149 Executive Director $39,890 $38,935 2023
Samaritan Foundation Charitable Trust GA$140,751 Former Trustee $45,472 $51,682 2023
Allen Morris Charitable Foundation GA$92,690 Trustee $29,331 $32,380 2024
Sterling Heights Area Community MI$91,339 Executive Di $35,625 $40,372 2024
Baraga County Community Foundation MI$90,676 Executive Director $38,998 $44,194 2024
Dr Maya Angelou Foundation CA$145,087 Board Chair $135,935 $125,553 2025
Sjsv Community Benefit Foundation CA$151,576 Chair $60,000 $56,884 2024
The Foundation Of The Broome-tioga NY$82,492 Chief Executive Officer $35,005 $34,729 2024
Jewish Family & Children's Services Of NJ$81,731 Ceo $68,048 $66,705 2024
Calvin Community Foundation IA$79,743 Ceo $10,541 $12,672 2024
Etna Community Organization PA$167,868 Executive Director $48,400 $52,993 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to MD cost of living and 2025 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to MD cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default11th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)22nd
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted0th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted72nd

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Al Ingraham) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 18 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (T31), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $10,933 is reasonable (approximately the 11th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.