Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Caldwell Senior Center Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 561470254
NC · NTEE P81
FY ending 2024-06-30
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of April Austin, Executive Director / CEO ($57,886) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 92 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 80th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: April Austin — reported title “EXECUTIVE DI”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

92 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 92 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$373 total compensation of comparable organizations → $90,365 $57,886
$9,73110th
$28,17825th
$40,589Median
$51,30275th
$67,71690th
$57,886This org · 80th
p10$9,731
p25$28,178
p50$40,589
p75$51,302
p90$67,716
$57,886

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to NC cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Opal's Dream Foundation Inc KY$198,438 Chief Operating Officer $66,177 $70,842 2023
Serving Older Adults Through Changing Ti OH$197,600 Executive Director $28,600 $29,317 2024
Menomonie Area Senior Center WI$197,565 Executive Dir. $32,498 $32,847 2024
Forest Park Senior Center Inc MD$200,485 Member $400 $373 2023
Clinchfield Senior Adult Center For TN$200,493 Executive Di $46,946 $46,527 2025
Penns Village PA$195,931 Executive Director $8,654 $8,352 2024
Topeka Lulac Multi-purpose Senior KS$200,910 Executive Di $44,125 $46,135 2024
Giles County Senior Citizens TN$195,590 Executive Director $31,085 $30,808 2025
Lita Love Is The Answer CA$195,577 Executive Dir. $70,538 $60,689 2023
Schuyler County Council On Aging MO$201,267 Director $17,272 $17,249 2025
Center For Successful Aging CA$195,248 Administrative Director $41,167 $35,420 2023
Anderson Valley Senior Citizens CA$201,687 Executive Di $18,436 $15,010 2025
Stl Village Inc MO$201,980 Executive Director $33,937 $35,814 2023
The Senior Center Inc NY$202,505 Executive Director $53,707 $45,758 2025
Senior Citizens Center WI$193,775 Co-director $47,569 $48,080 2024
Canopy Of Neighbors Inc NY$203,126 Executive Director $69,628 $60,892 2024
Interlakes Community Caregivers Inc NH$203,285 Executive Director $52,768 $48,549 2023
Cwa Littleton Inc CO$193,470 Executive Di $10,000 $9,280 2024
Monroe County Senior Citizens And TN$206,392 Executive Director $48,762 $48,327 2025
Northwest Neighbors Network WA$206,479 Director Of Community Operations & Outreach $100,341 $89,512 2023
Salida Senior Daycare Inc CO$188,933 Executive Director $45,000 $41,760 2024
Perry County Council On Aging Inc IN$208,621 Executive Director $39,520 $40,334 2024
Harpswell Aging At Home ME$187,857 Director $1,000 $969 2024
Cochran County Senior Citizens Assn TX$210,719 Manager $42,000 $41,862 2023
Pickett Fences Senior Services Inc MD$217,855 President $13,000 $12,110 2023

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to NC cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to NC cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default80th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)82nd
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted80th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted77th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (April Austin) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 92 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (P81), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $57,886 is reasonable (approximately the 80th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.