Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Piedmont Mediation Center Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 561547747
NC · NTEE I51Z
FY ending 2024-06-30
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Jessica Lemmons, Executive Director / CEO ($56,372) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 31 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 39th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

How comparable organizations were selected

31 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 31 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$1,551 total compensation of comparable organizations → $107,759 $56,372
$38,42110th
$49,41125th
$66,958Median
$73,20575th
$88,99290th
$56,372This org · 39th
p10$38,421
p25$49,411
p50$66,958
p75$73,205
p90$88,992
$56,372

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to NC cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateTotal revenueTotal compSource
Northwest Consumer Law CenterWA $373,988$107,759 990
Wenatchee Valley Dispute ResolutionWA $365,647$77,300 990
Court Referral ServicesAL $383,578$49,700 990
Fort Bend County DisputeTX $358,183$71,712 990
St Louis Mediation Project IncMO $344,806$1,551 990
Triad Restorative JusticeNC $403,331$49,420 990
Kuikahi Mediation Center IncHI $408,892$71,566 990
Tri Community Mediation IncMD $335,301$34,392 990
Dispute Resolution CenterMN $414,096$88,992 990
Northwest Mediation CenterWA $420,213$58,683 990
Center For Dispute ResolutionMI $420,565$38,421 990
Utah Dispute ResolutionUT $313,746$67,340 990
Resolution Center Of Jefferson AndNY $312,427$49,401 990
Conflict Resolution Center Of MontgomeryMD $439,875$89,001 990
Dispute Resolution Center OfMI $453,541$84,261 990
Benton Franklin Dispute Resolution CtrWA $459,789$66,958 990
Conflict Resolution Center IncNC $285,387$42,964 990
Restorative ArlingtonVA $280,733$63,628 990
Northern Virginia MediationVA $468,491$93,913 990
Accord A Center For DisputeNY $473,999$67,077 990
Mediation Services Of Maui IncHI $474,303$77,013 990
St Croix Valley RestorativeWI $264,006$74,698 990
Yolo Conflict Resolution CenterCA $263,331$67,226 990
San Joaquin Fair Housing Foundation IncCA $261,677$51,946 990
Center For Creative JusticeIA $260,473$71,055 990

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to NC cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default39th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)29th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted39th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted39th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Jessica Lemmons) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 31 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (I51), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $56,372 is reasonable (approximately the 39th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.