Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Sandhills Sandsharks Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 561838975
NC · NTEE N66Z
FY ending 2023-08-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Scott Gainey, Executive Director / CEO ($55,995) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 17 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 65th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Scott Gainey — reported title “HEAD COACH”, selected as the organization's highest-paid individual — no exact title match, so confirm this is a comparable role.

How comparable organizations were selected

17 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 17 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$956 total compensation of comparable organizations → $97,336 $55,995
$3,53710th
$21,59525th
$39,106Median
$69,96375th
$82,37690th
$55,995This org · 65th
p10$3,537
p25$21,595
p50$39,106
p75$69,963
p90$82,376
$55,995

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to NC cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Rochester Community Squash Inc NY$215,860 Executive Director $111,300 $97,336 2023
Firehawks Lacrosse Club CA$217,338 Former Executive Director $27,308 $21,595 2025
Dna Tennis Foundation Of Central Texas TX$221,978 President $1,246 $1,171 2024
Greater Pottstown Tennis & Learning PA$196,238 Exec Directo $73,980 $69,352 2024
Urban Squash Twin Cities MN$227,290 Executive Director $86,488 $80,336 2024
South Atlanta Community Tennis GA$237,219 Ceo/executive Director $25,875 $25,179 2023
Mahtomedi Youth Lacrosse Association MN$179,245 Boys Varsity Coach $1,000 $956 2023
Montgomery County Tennis Association MD$178,958 Executive Director $32,083 $28,197 2024
Greensboro Tennis Organization Inc NC$245,741 Ex. Dir., League Coord. $82,046 $79,692 2024
Kids On The Ball Inc VT$248,626 Chairman $55,702 $54,260 2023
Junior Tennis Foundation Inc NY$249,993 Executive Director & Ceo $80,000 $69,963 2023
River Cities Tennis Association IA$165,648 Executive Di $25,884 $26,642 2024
Bucks County Tennis Association PA$151,911 President Also Pr And Registration $20,000 $19,303 2023
Washington Inner City Lacrosse DC$271,843 Executive Director $100,600 $85,437 2023
Northern Ca Junior Lacrosse Association CA$288,145 Secretary $6,300 $5,114 2024
Five Star Volleyball Club Inc CO$296,416 President $42,140 $39,106 2023
Aspen Lacrosse Club CO$314,979 President $61,000 $54,984 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to NC cost of living and 2023 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to NC cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default65th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)59th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted65th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted65th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Scott Gainey) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 17 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (N66), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $55,995 is reasonable (approximately the 65th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.