Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Dixon Area Caring Center Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 562522501
MO · NTEE P20
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Mendy Sinden, Executive Director / CEO ($19,160) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 19 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 11th percentile of comparable organizationsbelow the typical range for comparable organizations

Benchmarked executive: Mendy Sinden — reported title “MANAGER OF CENTER”, selected as the organization's highest-paid individual — no exact title match, so confirm this is a comparable role.

How comparable organizations were selected

19 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 19 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$6,424 total compensation of comparable organizations → $137,271 $19,160
$17,12410th
$25,02125th
$43,342Median
$65,60575th
$90,69690th
$19,160This org · 11th
p10$17,124
p25$25,021
p50$43,342
p75$65,605
p90$90,696
$19,160

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to MO cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Lazarus Ministries Kc MO$235,818 Execive Director $61,000 $62,802 2023
Good Journey Development Foundation MO$236,159 Executive Director $68,407 $68,407 2024
Crusaders For The Cross MO$244,850 Secretary $6,630 $6,826 2023
Empower Me MO$207,979 Executive Director $76,500 $74,528 2025
Charlottes Community Outreach MO$253,986 Executive Director $123,482 $123,482 2024
Finding The Family MO$195,422 Board Member $47,724 $47,724 2024
Mama Nyumba MO$183,513 President & Ceo $19,685 $20,266 2023
Our Lady Of Perpetual Help Inc MO$182,366 Director $6,240 $6,424 2023
Porch Initiative MO$180,235 Executive Dir. $82,500 $82,500 2024
Birthstone Corporation MO$179,523 Assistant Treasurer $27,966 $28,792 2023
David Woods Kemper Veterans Foundation MO$176,768 Executive Director/trustee $133,333 $137,271 2023
Awl Foundation MO$174,601 Executive Di $33,756 $33,756 2024
Rk Missions MO$284,515 Director $27,700 $27,700 2024
Troy Dream Center Inc MO$167,207 Director Of The Troy Dream Center $45,000 $45,000 2024
Dads Against Crime Inc MO$294,829 President $43,333 $43,333 2024
Springs Of Living Water MO$300,744 Founder $50,000 $48,711 2025
Whosoever Mv Inc MO$310,329 Men's Director $21,700 $22,341 2023
College Hill Foundation MO$312,004 Executive Director $43,342 $43,342 2024
Jacob's Ladder Care Services Inc MO$336,934 Treasurer $19,698 $19,698 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to MO cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to MO cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default11th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)11th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted16th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted11th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Mendy Sinden) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 19 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (P20) + MO + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $19,160 is reasonable (approximately the 11th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.