Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Pickens County Advocacy Center Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 570790623
SC · NTEE F42Z
FY ending 2024-06-30
June 10, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Lou Anne Johnson, Executive Director / CEO ($65,219) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 17 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 29th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Lou Anne Johnson — reported title “EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

17 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 17 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$45,168 total compensation of comparable organizations → $114,711 $65,219
$50,62010th
$59,42225th
$66,718Median
$74,96175th
$89,67290th
$65,219This org · 29th
p10$50,620
p25$59,422
p50$66,718
p75$74,961
p90$89,672
$65,219

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to SC cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Idaho Anti Trafficking Coalition Inc ID$452,898 Executive Director $64,167 $67,363 2023
The Shafer Center For Crisis Intervention MS$450,069 Director $55,660 $59,422 2024
Rape Crisis Center Of Robeson County NC$415,796 Executive Director $66,462 $65,826 2024
Turning Point Women's Counseling PA$415,138 Executive Director $52,431 $51,599 2023
Rape Counselors Of East Alabama Inc AL$397,716 Executive Director $107,594 $114,711 2023
Pueblo Rape Crisis Services Inc CO$396,153 Executive Director $72,547 $66,680 2024
Willowbend Farms Inc TN$561,931 Ceo $74,398 $74,961 2024
The Upper Ohio Valley Sexual Assault Hel WV$570,757 Exective Director $46,000 $49,152 2023
Sexual Assault And Family Violence WY$375,458 Executive Di $65,000 $66,718 2024
Center For Sexual Assault Survivors VA$366,290 Executive Director $61,757 $57,157 2024
Project Response Inc NE$613,992 Executive Director $69,290 $69,595 2025
Sexual Assault Response And VA$333,429 Executive Di $86,088 $77,623 2025
Children's Center For Hope & Healing GA$632,954 Former Executive Director $66,500 $65,986 2023
Statesboro Regional Sexual Assault Center Inc GA$321,322 Director $72,857 $72,294 2023
Jackson County Sart OR$643,734 Executive Director $50,741 $45,168 2024
Silver Regional Sexual Assault Support Services NM$698,044 Executive Director $78,121 $82,919 2023
Compass Inc OH$706,385 Executive Director $98,303 $99,802 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to SC cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to SC cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default29th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)41st
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted35th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted29th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Lou Anne Johnson) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 10, 2026, comparing compensation against 17 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (F42), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $65,219 is reasonable (approximately the 29th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 10, 2026.