Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Lorena-lemon-burns Water Association

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 640796096
MS · NTEE W80
FY ending 2024-06-30
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Shelton Lewis, Executive Director / CEO ($600) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 19 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 11th percentile of comparable organizationsbelow the typical range for comparable organizations

Benchmarked executive: Shelton Lewis — reported title “PRESIDENT”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

19 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 19 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$122 total compensation of comparable organizations → $90,832 $600
$1,54310th
$2,67825th
$19,940Median
$25,80375th
$38,55790th
$600This org · 11th
p10$1,543
p25$2,678
p50$19,940
p75$25,803
p90$38,557
$600

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to MS cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Ptda Foundation IL$261,016 Executive Director $27,174 $24,696 2023
Graham East Water Supply Corp TX$241,562 Secretary $18,354 $16,485 2024
Los Tules Mutual Water Company CA$239,926 Director $28,700 $22,251 2024
Southwest Wayne Water Assoc Inc MS$238,996 President $325 $325 2024
Trenton Water Users Cooperative ND$235,707 President $2,390 $2,355 2024
Northwest Turfgrass Association WA$232,382 Executive Director $32,515 $26,909 2023
Prairie Village Water Trust WI$231,474 Trustee $3,200 $3,001 2024
Groom Creek Water Users Association AZ$225,386 Officeoperations Mangr Past $37,500 $32,381 2024
Suncoast Utility Contractors Association Inc FL$288,574 Executive Director $75,000 $63,261 2024
Alabama Water System Inc LA$288,757 Director $23,900 $23,629 2024
Roosevelt Lake Ranch Water System WA$290,518 President $15,750 $13,035 2023
Marsha Water Supply Corporation TX$212,265 President $32,435 $29,131 2024
The Niwot Ditch Company CO$207,506 Secretary $2,500 $2,306 2022
North Tallahatchie Water Assn Inc MS$302,881 Secretary/treasurer $19,940 $19,940 2024
Acme Water Company Inc UT$306,348 President $2,010 $1,847 2024
Lake Pillsbury Properties CA$177,382 Director $31,276 $23,624 2025
American Fork Irrigation Co UT$349,138 President And Watermaster $96,007 $90,832 2023
Chiwawa Communities Association WA$376,802 President $21,600 $17,364 2024
Thorn Water Association Inc MS$379,388 President $125 $122 2025

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to MS cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to MS cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default11th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)11th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted16th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted11th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Shelton Lewis) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 19 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (W80), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $600 is reasonable (approximately the 11th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.