Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Ventura Football Club

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 680638144
CA · NTEE N65
FY ending 2023-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Jack Craig, Executive Director / CEO ($37,282) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 19 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 42nd percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Jack Craig — reported title “EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

19 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 19 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$5,946 total compensation of comparable organizations → $94,491 $37,282
$11,83510th
$29,04525th
$56,300Median
$76,69375th
$92,73490th
$37,282This org · 42nd
p10$11,835
p25$29,045
p50$56,300
p75$76,693
p90$92,734
$37,282

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to CA cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
United States Australian Football TN$423,091 Executive Director $79,543 $94,050 2024
Scyr Inc CA$395,855 Executive Dir. $70,000 $67,992 2024
New England Fusion Fastpitch NH$431,152 Vice President $12,000 $12,464 2024
Fm Athletics Inc ND$390,506 Bookkeeper/administrator $25,763 $31,803 2024
Tonka Football Association Of Minnesota MN$385,984 Director $41,007 $46,925 2023
Burlington Football Club VT$385,712 Executive Director $27,536 $31,176 2024
Park City Passing League UT$355,242 Executive Director $47,500 $56,300 2023
Tualatin Valley Youth Football Leag OR$351,869 Commissioner $8,667 $9,321 2023
Victory Formation Foundation Inc CA$482,089 President & Ceo $75,000 $72,848 2024
Sacramento Youth Football CA$482,733 President And Secr $56,941 $56,941 2023
Edina Football Association MN$325,046 Director $24,691 $28,254 2023
All Out Flag Football Corporation CA$505,654 Munson $88,883 $86,333 2024
Mamaroneck Youth Football League Inc NY$313,966 Director $5,850 $5,946 2024
Northeast Oklahoma Futball Club OK$534,269 Secretary $23,000 $28,488 2024
Isaac Bruce Foundation MO$289,143 Executive Director $67,600 $80,538 2024
Byron Youth Football Association MN$288,876 Board Member $51,480 $57,219 2024
Cross Training Football Inc NY$287,124 President $90,910 $92,405 2024
Saint Raphael Football Inc IL$281,622 Business Manager $26,000 $29,602 2023
The 2nd And 7 Foundation OH$598,240 Executive Director $77,036 $94,491 2023

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to CA cost of living and 2023 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to CA cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default42nd
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)42nd
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted47th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted42nd

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Jack Craig) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 19 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (N65), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $37,282 is reasonable (approximately the 42nd percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.