Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Bella Vista Recycling Foundation

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 710838077
AR · NTEE C27
FY ending 2023-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Louis Stirek, Executive Director / CEO ($43,400) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 18 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 56th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Louis Stirek — reported title “Director”, selected as the organization's highest-paid individual — no exact title match, so confirm this is a comparable role.

How comparable organizations were selected

18 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 18 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$4,553 total compensation of comparable organizations → $152,066 $43,400
$9,83510th
$18,78525th
$30,518Median
$59,81775th
$77,30590th
$43,400This org · 56th
p10$9,835
p25$18,785
p50$30,518
p75$59,817
p90$77,305
$43,400

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to AR cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Cwmu Association UT$259,051 Secretary $5,000 $4,553 2023
Kanu Hawaii HI$257,751 Executive Director $64,996 $50,284 2024
The Idea Store Creative Reuse Center IL$272,176 Manager $33,663 $29,442 2023
Bowling Green Recycling Center Inc OH$234,872 Chairman $11,045 $10,109 2024
Methow Recycles WA$291,962 Executive Director $29,913 $23,142 2024
The Recyclery Collective IL$227,204 Director / Programming Coordinator $20,403 $17,333 2024
Maine Resource Recovery Association ME$223,731 Executive Di $54,674 $46,089 2025
Keuka Lake Association NY$218,784 Secretary $19,703 $15,385 2024
Habits Of Waste CA$307,102 Founder, Director, President, Ed $133,943 $99,944 2024
People For Urban Progress Inc IN$215,173 Executive Director $52,911 $48,216 2024
Regenerative Education Centers Inc HI$203,725 Pres/executi $39,800 $30,791 2024
Bk Rot Inc NY$319,398 Executive Director $82,810 $62,995 2025
Cement Kiln Recycling Coalition VA$322,206 Executive Director $177,030 $152,066 2023
Deidox Films Inc CA$194,842 Chair/executive Director $88,000 $67,602 2023
Reuse It Center Inc KS$365,928 Director $31,468 $30,244 2023
Recreative Denver CO$372,240 Executive Director $10,780 $9,196 2023
Wachusett Earthday Incorporated MA$372,421 Executive Di $34,616 $26,880 2024
Carolina Recycling Association SC$389,773 Executive Di $73,079 $65,879 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to AR cost of living and 2023 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to AR cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default56th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)56th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted56th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted56th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Louis Stirek) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 18 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (C27), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $43,400 is reasonable (approximately the 56th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.