Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

South Central

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 721378792
LA · NTEE S30
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Hillary Charpentier, Executive Director / CEO ($86,538) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 142 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 76th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

How comparable organizations were selected

142 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 142 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$1,212 total compensation of comparable organizations → $194,693 $86,538
$13,31210th
$34,15025th
$61,966Median
$85,02275th
$113,89390th
$86,538This org · 76th
p10$13,312
p25$34,150
p50$61,966
p75$85,022
p90$113,893
$86,538

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to LA cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateTotal revenueTotal compSource
West Bloomington Revitalization ProjectIL $259,902$16,601 990
Naugatuck Valley Project IncCT $263,743$59,605 990
Noble County Convention And VisitorIN $267,279$54,860 990
Downtown Excelsior Partnership IncMO $267,348$84,796 990
Rhea Economic And Tourism CouncilTN $268,307$48,941 990
Building 127 Ll IncNY $268,876$81,435 990
Marin Economic ForumCA $269,302$147,853 990
Wentworth Economic Development CorpNH $269,573$59,873 990
Chicago Southland EconomicIL $270,201$32,240 990
The Space On MainVT $251,549$71,522 990
Ozaukee County Economic Development CorporationWI $273,374$34,144 990
Fondren Renaissance FoundationMS $273,767$71,392 990
Ypo DfwTX $274,534$17,700 990
Renaissance Heights FoundationTX $274,703$95,750 990
Central Arkansas CouncilAR $275,000$5,255 990
Economic Collaborative Of N ArizonaAZ $246,722$91,585 990
Agile City Winston-salemNC $246,249$158,232 990
Crawford County Economic Development ParIN $278,080$28,988 990
Milestone Growth Capital InstituteMI $244,356$34,167 990
Everett Station District AllianceWA $244,137$40,178 990
Washington Business Improvement DisNJ $279,277$58,023 990
Economic Development Corporation OfIL $243,161$71,426 990
So Cal Corporate Growth PartnersCA $241,473$70,716 990
Elizabeth Avenue Partnership IncNJ $281,262$79,505 990
Southwest Michigan Regional ChamberMI $241,122$4,535 990

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to LA cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default76th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)70th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted77th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted63rd

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Hillary Charpentier) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 142 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (S30), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $86,538 is reasonable (approximately the 76th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.