Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Ladies In Power

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 760810597
CA · NTEE P80
FY ending 2023-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Taneshia Miller, Executive Director / CEO ($13,333) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 18 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 17th percentile of comparable organizationsbelow the typical range for comparable organizations

Benchmarked executive: Taneshia Miller — reported title “CEO/Director”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

18 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 18 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$1,457 total compensation of comparable organizations → $101,246 $13,333
$6,83310th
$20,00025th
$38,109Median
$65,20975th
$84,55690th
$13,333This org · 17th
p10$6,833
p25$20,000
p50$38,109
p75$65,209
p90$84,556
$13,333

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to CA cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Women's Initiatives That Strengthen And CA$261,621 Director $36,000 $34,967 2024
Lynne Cohen Foundation CA$260,469 President And Executive Di $76,665 $76,665 2023
Bridging Relationships In Diverse Groups CA$260,330 Former President $24,411 $24,411 2023
The Erika Whitmore Godwin Foundation CA$243,885 Founder & Ceo $101,246 $101,246 2023
Southside Senior Services Inc CA$242,246 Executive Director $50,175 $50,175 2023
Farm To Fork CA$233,962 Esterline $33,001 $32,054 2024
Abled CA$308,176 Executive Director $9,000 $8,742 2024
Autism Health Insurance Project Inc CA$225,306 President/program Director $91,250 $91,250 2023
Northern California Peoples Advocate CA$223,661 President $66,000 $66,000 2023
Greek Orthodox Housing Corporation CA$222,266 Chief Executive Officer $1,500 $1,457 2024
Mujeres Extraordinaries Inc CA$320,180 President $41,250 $41,250 2023
Deaf Ability Resource Inc CA$210,740 Ceo / President $84,100 $81,687 2024
Promoting Responsible Independence In Daily Endeavors Inc CA$195,145 President $30,000 $29,139 2024
Westfield Residence Inc CA$189,049 Director $2,450 $2,380 2024
Supporting The Taylor House Inc CA$357,458 Executive Dir. $14,808 $14,808 2023
Wounded Heroes Fund Kern County CA$371,752 Executive Dir. $64,690 $62,834 2024
Amor Wellness Center Inc CA$389,449 Treasurer $19,077 $18,530 2024
Maryam Parman Foundation CA$399,680 Executive Dir. $44,936 $44,936 2023

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to CA cost of living and 2023 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to CA cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default17th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)17th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted22nd
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted17th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Taneshia Miller) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 18 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (P80) + CA + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $13,333 is reasonable (approximately the 17th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.