Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Chinese Performing Arts Of America

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 770301932
CA · NTEE A620
FY ending 2023-06-30
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Lihong Zhang, Executive Director / CEO ($36,000) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 23 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 39th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Lihong Zhang — reported title “EXECUTIVE DIR”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

23 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 23 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$10,284 total compensation of comparable organizations → $113,905 $36,000
$17,53110th
$26,63525th
$41,806Median
$83,08175th
$97,99890th
$36,000This org · 39th
p10$17,531
p25$26,635
p50$41,806
p75$83,081
p90$97,998
$36,000

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to CA cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Backhausdance CA$430,632 Officer/artistic Director $25,425 $25,425 2023
California Dance Institute CA$410,669 Director $44,180 $41,806 2025
Cubacaribe CA$405,942 Board Member $101,115 $98,214 2024
Senderos CA$403,770 Executive Dir. $20,625 $20,625 2023
Regina Klenjoski Dance Company CA$402,715 Executive Dir. $42,000 $40,795 2024
Dance Camera West CA$399,106 Executive Dir. $29,507 $29,507 2023
Sonoma Conservatory Of Dance CA$387,135 President $114,194 $110,918 2024
Invertigo Dance Theatre CA$380,509 President/board Member $89,812 $89,812 2023
Na Lei Hulu I Ka Wekiu Hula Halau CA$507,701 President $33,600 $32,636 2024
Motion Pacific Dance Inc CA$365,970 President $17,955 $17,440 2024
Flyaway Productions CA$360,501 Director $40,241 $39,086 2024
Axis Dance Company CA$523,424 Managing Dir $100,003 $97,134 2024
California Line Dance Association Of CA$526,269 Secretary & Cfo $18,422 $17,893 2024
Embodiment Project CA$534,375 Chairman $80,000 $77,705 2024
Lake Tahoe Dance Collective CA$344,486 Exec/artist Dir $28,667 $27,845 2024
Jess Curtisgravity Inc CA$341,407 Director/exec. Dir. (Starting Mar.) $47,535 $46,171 2024
Margaret Jenkins Dance Studio Inc CA$541,453 President, Artistic Dir $117,269 $113,905 2024
Cashion Cultural Legacy CA$543,043 Executive Dir. $84,069 $81,657 2024
Robert Moses Kin CA$333,756 Artistic Dir. $10,868 $10,284 2025
Santa Barbara Festival Ballet CA$326,642 Conservatory Director $17,262 $16,767 2024
Friends Of Olympia Station Inc CA$324,338 Executive Dir. $60,000 $56,776 2025
Tannery World Dance & Cultural Center CA$573,265 Executive Dir. $87,000 $84,504 2024
The High Steppers Drill Team Inc CA$302,799 President $53,800 $50,910 2025

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to CA cost of living and 2023 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to CA cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default39th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)39th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted39th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted39th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Lihong Zhang) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 23 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (A62) + CA + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $36,000 is reasonable (approximately the 39th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.