Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Bunker Residential Home

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 800979534
MO · NTEE F33
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Julia Parker, Executive Director / CEO ($23,914) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 32 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 31st percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

How comparable organizations were selected

32 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 32 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$735 total compensation of comparable organizations → $278,096 $23,914
$9,62110th
$20,42125th
$32,164Median
$62,52875th
$64,76790th
$23,914This org · 31st
p10$9,621
p25$20,421
p50$32,164
p75$62,528
p90$64,767
$23,914

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to MO cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateTotal revenueTotal compSource
Bell Tower IncIN $109,853$64,767 990
Thresholds Housing IncIL $116,338$29,825 990
Aspire To Be GreatOH $104,983$20,809 990
Ocl Properties Vii IncNY $104,552$62,528 990
Stepping Stones To Success IncCA $118,760$26,415 990
Project Share Vi IncNY $103,215$61,980 990
Lakeview Place IncFL $100,580$10,754 990
Spf-irochIL $99,742$29,601 990
Watertower West IncIN $99,521$64,767 990
Ocl Properties Iii West IncNY $98,287$62,528 990
Cla Homes I CorpVA $98,070$3,424 990
Obed Apartments IncRI $124,781$48,924 990
Richardville Apartments Ii IncIN $96,141$66,984 990
Valley Of The Sun School Properties SixAZ $95,649$18,641 990
Burrell Housing Options CorporationMO $94,337$278,096 990
Project Share Vii IncNY $93,702$61,980 990
180 Recovery HouseAL $88,295$25,775 990
Orchard Community IncCA $88,278$34,555 990
Project Share V IncNY $136,251$61,980 990
Castor Housing Development CorporationPA $82,752$735 990
Woolard Homes IncMD $82,272$46,791 990
Brandon Apartments IncFL $141,075$34,342 990
Ocl Properties V IncNY $141,200$62,528 990
New Strides IncNY $79,531$9,495 990
Dream Works IncNC $76,982$8,486 990

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to MO cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default31st
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)34th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted88th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted6th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Julia Parker) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 32 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (F33), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $23,914 is reasonable (approximately the 31st percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.