Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Community Hope Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 810424204
MT · NTEE P60Z
FY ending 2024-03-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Lisa Foreman, Executive Director / CEO ($34,275) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 19 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 79th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Lisa Foreman — reported title “DIRECTOR”, selected as the organization's highest-paid individual — no exact title match, so confirm this is a comparable role.

How comparable organizations were selected

19 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 19 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$571 total compensation of comparable organizations → $161,417 $34,275
$10,17010th
$17,35825th
$21,720Median
$32,62675th
$44,18290th
$34,275This org · 79th
p10$10,170
p25$17,358
p50$21,720
p75$32,626
p90$44,182
$34,275

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to MT cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
West Middlesex Volunteer Fire Department PA$76,112 Secretary/treasurer $599 $571 2023
Hagen Center MN$75,642 President $11,600 $10,633 2024
40 West Assistance & Referral Center Inc MD$74,929 Center Director $22,500 $19,514 2024
Alterra Mountain Company CO$69,315 Foundation Director (Thru 6/24) $181,460 $161,417 2024
Eagles Nest Foundation WA$86,597 Director $30,000 $24,917 2024
Schuyler Ministerial Association NE$67,286 Director $20,200 $20,155 2024
Military Families United - Michigan MI$64,420 Treasurer $20,000 $19,151 2024
Helping Hands Of Potsdam Inc NY$90,906 Executive Di $25,910 $21,720 2024
Izzys Angels Inc MD$60,824 Executive Director $52,000 $46,432 2023
The Sandbox Group Inc NC$97,621 President $44,200 $43,620 2023
Help By Phone Ltd MD$57,470 Treasurer $10,800 $9,644 2023
Helping Hands Of Franklin County VA$99,715 Exec Director $11,500 $10,301 2024
Norman Care Association Vans OK$100,923 Driver $25,000 $25,538 2024
United We Serve TX$108,100 Ceo/co-chairman $16,292 $15,565 2023
Family Promise Of Santa Rosa Inc FL$108,782 Executive Director $31,656 $28,403 2023
Dearborn County Clearing House For IN$109,770 Exec Directo $44,446 $43,482 2024
Lake Area Ministries Inc MO$110,385 Manager $33,333 $32,752 2024
Onpath Foundation LA$114,172 President $19,796 $20,222 2024
Dine Brands Global Foundation Inc CA$114,932 Board Member $39,406 $32,499 2023

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to MT cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to MT cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default79th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)74th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted79th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted68th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Lisa Foreman) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 19 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (P60), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $34,275 is reasonable (approximately the 79th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.