Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Build And Restore International

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 811612962
CA · NTEE Q33
FY ending 2023-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Ostap Dzyndra, Executive Director / CEO ($20,000) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 21 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 29th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Ostap Dzyndra — reported title “President”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

21 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 21 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$5,246 total compensation of comparable organizations → $112,857 $20,000
$8,74210th
$16,99725th
$36,910Median
$75,00075th
$98,29190th
$20,000This org · 29th
p10$8,742
p25$16,997
p50$36,910
p75$75,000
p90$98,291
$20,000

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to CA cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Ruel Foundation Usa CA$229,495 Board Member $5,401 $5,246 2024
The Senegal Health Institute CA$240,744 Exec Director $58,240 $56,569 2024
Here For Kids International CA$242,854 Exec Director $98,291 $98,291 2023
A Touch Of Love Foundation CA$244,733 President $74,868 $72,720 2024
Unatti Foundation CA$247,939 President $38,000 $36,910 2024
Because Of Hope CA$213,002 President/exec Director $42,000 $40,795 2024
Safe Harbor International Relief CA$211,451 President & Ceo $9,000 $8,742 2024
Advanced Center For Eyecare Global CA$258,535 Executive Dir. $75,000 $75,000 2023
Far Reaching Ministries Aviation Inc CA$260,470 Ceo $108,806 $105,684 2024
Global Effect Ministries CA$203,401 President $17,499 $16,997 2024
The Charis Project CA$263,271 Ceo $24,000 $23,311 2024
Onmission Partners CA$275,568 Ceo & Secret $30,000 $30,000 2023
Compassion Connection CA$185,155 Ceo/president $79,500 $77,219 2024
Afghan Literacy Foundation CA$284,594 Executive Director $13,000 $12,627 2024
Gocare Inc CA$302,675 President $44,000 $44,000 2023
Adopt A Family Foundation CA$314,408 Ceo/chair $6,000 $5,828 2024
Hope Filled Hearts 4 Africa Inc CA$318,590 President $12,000 $11,656 2024
Guatemala Deaf Ministries CA$321,509 Vice President $32,875 $31,932 2024
Faith Hope And Charity Inc CA$329,606 Secretary/treasurer $25,200 $25,200 2023
Bridges Of Hope International CA$332,038 President $112,857 $112,857 2023
Angel Of Faith Non Profit Organization CA$346,809 President $82,500 $80,133 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to CA cost of living and 2023 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to CA cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default29th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)29th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted29th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted29th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Ostap Dzyndra) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 21 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (Q33) + CA + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $20,000 is reasonable (approximately the 29th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.