Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Lone Star Buddhist Meditation Center Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 811807050
TX · NTEE X50
FY ending 2023-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Mahasmevnawa Buddhist Cent, Executive Director / CEO ($22,000) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 20 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 60th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Mahasmevnawa Buddhist Cent — reported title “HEAD MONK”, selected as the organization's highest-paid individual — no exact title match, so confirm this is a comparable role.

How comparable organizations were selected

20 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 20 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$3,773 total compensation of comparable organizations → $119,649 $22,000
$5,16410th
$6,97925th
$14,667Median
$31,57175th
$86,21490th
$22,000This org · 60th
p10$5,164
p25$6,979
p50$14,667
p75$31,571
p90$86,214
$22,000

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to TX cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Buta Buddhism Research Center CA$304,544 President & Ceo $8,500 $7,127 2024
Drepung Loseling Institute Of Texas TX$287,822 Director $31,200 $30,305 2024
Wong Tai-sen Center CA$284,118 President $12,000 $10,359 2023
Diamond Cutter Classics AZ$273,905 President $36,789 $35,370 2023
Cambridge House For Inner Peace Inc MA$333,993 Former Executive Director $97,926 $85,447 2024
The Korinji Foundation WI$269,299 President $24,700 $25,048 2024
Soto Zen Buddhism International Center CA$266,197 President $15,500 $12,661 2025
Santa Monastery CO$248,734 President $30,000 $27,932 2024
The Center For Contemplative CO$363,705 Executive Di $100,008 $93,115 2024
Lien Hoa Tu CA$242,753 Ceo $9,600 $8,287 2023
Tu Hieu Buddhist Temple TX$232,821 Buddhist/president $14,600 $14,181 2024
Meditation Center Of Texas TX$383,409 Secretary $15,600 $15,152 2024
Danang Foundation Corp NY$218,974 President $45,600 $40,011 2024
Won Buddhism Of The Usa Inc MD$218,674 President $7,200 $6,536 2024
Dharma Ocean Foundation CO$391,743 Executive Di $19,044 $17,732 2024
Palbar Ling Center CA$206,296 President $6,000 $5,031 2024
Hua Zang Buddhist Institute CA$404,747 Cfo $4,500 $3,773 2024
Everyday Zen Inc CA$409,215 President $142,700 $119,649 2024
Dieu Nhan Buddhist Med Ass Inc CA$425,350 President $6,000 $5,179 2023
Vien An Buddhist Association MD$452,794 President $6,560 $6,131 2023

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to TX cost of living and 2023 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to TX cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default60th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)60th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted0th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted60th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Mahasmevnawa Buddhist Cent) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 20 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (X50), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $22,000 is reasonable (approximately the 60th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.