Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

New England Fusion Fastpitch

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 813464690
NH · NTEE N65
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Pete Misiaszek, Executive Director / CEO ($12,000) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 18 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 11th percentile of comparable organizationsbelow the typical range for comparable organizations

Benchmarked executive: Pete Misiaszek — reported title “Vice President”, selected as the organization's highest-paid individual — no exact title match, so confirm this is a comparable role.

How comparable organizations were selected

18 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 18 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$5,725 total compensation of comparable organizations → $90,974 $12,000
$21,73410th
$30,16725th
$49,692Median
$68,96975th
$85,35090th
$12,000This org · 11th
p10$21,734
p25$30,167
p50$49,692
p75$68,969
p90$85,350
$12,000

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to NH cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
United States Australian Football TN$423,091 Executive Director $79,543 $90,550 2024
Ventura Football Club CA$412,756 Executive Director $37,282 $35,895 2023
Scyr Inc CA$395,855 Executive Dir. $70,000 $65,462 2024
Fm Athletics Inc ND$390,506 Bookkeeper/administrator $25,763 $30,619 2024
Tonka Football Association Of Minnesota MN$385,984 Director $41,007 $45,178 2023
Burlington Football Club VT$385,712 Executive Director $27,536 $30,016 2024
Victory Formation Foundation Inc CA$482,089 President & Ceo $75,000 $70,138 2024
Sacramento Youth Football CA$482,733 President And Secr $56,941 $54,822 2023
All Out Flag Football Corporation CA$505,654 Munson $88,883 $83,121 2024
Park City Passing League UT$355,242 Executive Director $47,500 $54,205 2023
Tualatin Valley Youth Football Leag OR$351,869 Commissioner $8,667 $8,974 2023
Northeast Oklahoma Futball Club OK$534,269 Secretary $23,000 $27,428 2024
Edina Football Association MN$325,046 Director $24,691 $27,203 2023
Mamaroneck Youth Football League Inc NY$313,966 Director $5,850 $5,725 2024
Isaac Bruce Foundation MO$289,143 Executive Director $67,600 $77,541 2024
Byron Youth Football Association MN$288,876 Board Member $51,480 $55,090 2024
The 2nd And 7 Foundation OH$598,240 Executive Director $77,036 $90,974 2023
The Charity Bowl Football Game VA$639,993 Executive Director $40,000 $41,827 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to NH cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to NH cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default11th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)11th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted17th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted11th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Pete Misiaszek) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 18 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (N65), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $12,000 is reasonable (approximately the 11th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.