Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Onmain Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 832877212
OH · NTEE S30
FY ending 2023-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Emile Lachance, Executive Director / CEO ($42,799) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 19 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 68th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Emile Lachance — reported title “President/COO”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

19 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 19 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$16,512 total compensation of comparable organizations → $92,709 $42,799
$19,65710th
$22,98425th
$32,522Median
$53,94475th
$84,83290th
$42,799This org · 68th
p10$19,657
p25$22,984
p50$32,522
p75$53,944
p90$84,832
$42,799

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to OH cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Dawson Co Economic Development Council MT$66,093 Executive Director $28,500 $28,173 2024
Regional Economic Development And Energy NY$60,050 President $106,965 $88,640 2024
Innovation Fund America Inc OH$75,113 Treasurer $17,000 $16,512 2024
Wake Forest Innovation Quarter Cdc NC$75,240 Director & President $56,067 $54,697 2023
Grants Mainstreet Project NM$75,786 Executive Dire $26,017 $25,000 2025
Barrio Logan Association CA$77,320 Director $53,800 $42,603 2024
The Partnership Foundation Inc MS$55,821 Secretary $20,071 $20,500 2024
Advancect Foundation Inc CT$52,816 President $24,386 $20,968 2024
Borderplex Community Capital Inc TX$80,591 President & Ceo $91,437 $83,880 2024
Pidc Financing Corporation PA$51,975 Executive Vice President $72,708 $66,493 2024
Community Development Fund Of Utah UT$81,669 Chief Executive Officer $27,320 $26,400 2023
Orleans County Local Development NY$82,917 C.e.o./c.f.o. $23,698 $19,638 2024
Lakewood Heritage Foundation MN$50,095 President $21,699 $19,662 2024
Caldwell 2020 Inc NC$50,000 President & Ceo $46,200 $42,649 2025
Overland Park Chamber Foundation KS$85,551 President $32,826 $32,522 2024
Dewitt County Development Council IL$45,776 Executive Dir. $42,470 $37,303 2025
Lincoln Economic Advancement & IL$94,896 Ceo $99,879 $92,709 2023
Vergennes Partnership Inc VT$96,959 Executive Director $27,560 $25,439 2024
Greenfield Main Street Inc IN$99,764 Executive Director $55,000 $53,190 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to OH cost of living and 2023 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to OH cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default68th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)58th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted0th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted89th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Emile Lachance) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 19 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (S30), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $42,799 is reasonable (approximately the 68th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.