Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Massenergize Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 833545333
MA · NTEE C35
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Nathan Scott, Executive Director / CEO ($100,730) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 38 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 58th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Nathan Scott — reported title “Executive director”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

38 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 38 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$2,339 total compensation of comparable organizations → $214,930 $100,730
$27,52010th
$51,86825th
$93,390Median
$135,92275th
$157,26890th
$100,730This org · 58th
p10$27,520
p25$51,868
p50$93,390
p75$135,922
p90$157,268
$100,730

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to MA cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Energy Smart Colorado Inc CO$471,593 Executive Di $105,706 $116,126 2023
Smart Energy Consumer Collaborative GA$458,027 Deputy Director $105,313 $117,837 2024
Clean Energy Ventures OH$446,728 President $55,133 $64,982 2024
Climate And Energy Project Inc KS$492,409 Executive Di $87,272 $108,020 2023
Four Corners Office For Resource Eff CO$438,494 Executive Director $62,922 $69,125 2023
Efficiency Valuation Organization DC$429,723 Executive Director $146,752 $143,308 2024
Alternative Energy Resources Org MT$507,861 Executive Director $59,074 $72,956 2023
Missouri Energy Initiative MO$421,763 Executive Di $122,100 $143,913 2024
Electrification Coalition Alliance Inc DC$421,500 Executive Director $38,801 $37,891 2024
Slo Climate Coalition CA$418,019 Albers $105,499 $98,764 2025
Iowa Business For Clean Energy IA$526,784 Executive Di $82,119 $100,059 2024
National Energy Assistance Directors DC$528,238 Executive Director $160,593 $156,825 2024
Us Research Impact Alliance Corp WV$406,795 Executive Director $173,262 $214,930 2023
Smart Buildings Center Education Program WA$400,015 Executive Director $26,536 $26,438 2024
Southern Star Medical Research Institute TX$396,384 Trustee/chairman & Pres $190,400 $211,947 2024
Mason County Climate Justice WA$391,936 President $13,546 $13,496 2024
Cleantech Leaders Roundtable MA$547,838 Executive Director Until 8/31/24 $89,001 $89,001 2024
Climate Collaborative WA$378,511 Executive Director $142,585 $146,256 2023
Tennessee Advanced Energy Business TN$378,450 Executive Di $2,000 $2,339 2024
Blue Planet Foundation HI$377,633 Executive Director $30,885 $30,771 2024
Green Light New Orleans LA$368,293 Executive Dir. $99,000 $121,311 2024
Clean Energy Districts Of Iowa IA$368,249 Board Member $5,305 $6,655 2023
Frack Action Fund Inc NY$354,000 Executive Director $120,000 $120,669 2024
Tulsa Bike Share Inc OK$338,763 Executive Dir. $73,620 $92,877 2023
Greater Lansing Area Clean Cities MI$601,120 President, Ceo (Nec) $24,362 $27,983 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to MA cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to MA cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default58th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)61st
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted55th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted42nd

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Nathan Scott) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 38 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (C35), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $100,730 is reasonable (approximately the 58th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.