Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Jobs By George Foundation

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 841350812
CO · NTEE O51
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Steve Finesilver, Executive Director / CEO ($20,000) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 18 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 11th percentile of comparable organizationsbelow the typical range for comparable organizations

Benchmarked executive: Steve Finesilver — reported title “PRESIDENT”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

18 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 18 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$18,848 total compensation of comparable organizations → $93,889 $20,000
$23,29910th
$40,08125th
$56,685Median
$68,40175th
$78,83890th
$20,000This org · 11th
p10$23,299
p25$40,081
p50$56,685
p75$68,401
p90$78,838
$20,000

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to CO cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Hope Offered To People Everywhere OH$303,070 President $34,000 $37,556 2024
We Love Philly PA$303,074 Executive Director $72,859 $78,011 2023
The Consumption Literacy Project CO$294,184 Secretary $42,750 $44,013 2023
Young Adults For Positive Action Of Colorado LA$307,456 Executive Director $54,500 $64,434 2023
Open Doors For Youth MN$279,830 Executive Director $76,128 $80,767 2023
Samaritans 365 Foundation Inc FL$273,549 Exec. Direct $71,167 $69,723 2024
Northeastern Pennsylvania Youth Shelter PA$264,551 Executive Director $38,307 $41,016 2023
Sports Mentorship Academy MN$339,932 Executive Di $55,200 $58,563 2023
Ross Valley Lacrosse Club CA$240,743 President $62,471 $54,807 2025
Laru Beya Collective Incorporated NY$239,790 Executive Director $20,000 $18,848 2024
Youth As Resources Inc MD$362,825 Executive Dir. $71,680 $71,952 2023
Circle K International Inc IN$373,342 Kyp Executive Director $36,161 $39,769 2024
Punx With Purpose OR$394,808 Treasurer $20,000 $19,370 2024
Kinston Teens Inc NC$200,814 Chief Executive Officer $55,000 $61,018 2023
Grow Healthy Kids Inc FL$426,636 Executive Di $25,500 $24,983 2024
Southtown Youth Programs Center IL$426,970 President $50,405 $53,206 2023
Youth Challenge Inc CO$436,137 Director $61,250 $61,250 2024
Center For Acknowledging The Values Accomplishments And Lives Of TX$445,331 Executive Director $90,000 $93,889 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to CO cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to CO cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default11th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)0th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted17th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted11th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Steve Finesilver) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 18 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (O51), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $20,000 is reasonable (approximately the 11th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.